From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48110) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7XiC-0002ZV-5y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:25:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7XiB-00037A-49 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:25:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7XiA-00036m-En for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:25:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i7XiA-0007sA-87 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:25:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#37080] [PATCH] Update emacs-org-recent-headings. Resent-Message-ID: From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87lfverjcq.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:24:44 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Brian Leung's message of "Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:52:49 +0200") Message-ID: <87tv9ksrqr.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Brian Leung Cc: 37080@debbugs.gnu.org Hello Brian, Brian Leung writes: > Hi Ludovic, > > The patches haven't been applied upstream. The upstream maintainer doesn't > review PRs in a timely manner, so I thought it might be worth submitting > the patch here. > > Thanks, > Brian > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:30 PM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrot= e: > >> Hi Brian, >> >> Brian Leung skribis: >> >> > The version of emacs-org-recent-headings on Guix doesn't work correctly >> for >> > people with Helm installed. I submitted patches to the upstream >> maintainer >> > of emacs-org-recent-headings. Attached is a Guix patch incorporating t= he >> > changes. >> >> Have these patches been applied upstream? >> >> Since we=E2=80=99re building from an upstream commit, we might just as w= ell wait >> until the changes are available upstream. >> >> Thanks, >> Ludo=E2=80=99. +1, especially since the patches submitted upstream are still a WIP, AFAICT. (see: https://github.com/alphapapa/org-recent-headings/issues/11). Let's wait until a conclusion for a fix is reached and merged upstream before we continue. Thanks for your efforts in investigating the problem and working on a fix. Maxim