From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id yO/pCHx0219sXwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:08:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 6Nu+BHx0218/UgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:08:44 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C17FE940919 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:08:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55992 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kputV-0002jX-Fq for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 10:08:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpun4-0004s5-ON for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 10:02:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53349) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpun4-0008AO-Gm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 10:02:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kpun4-0004wA-D1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 10:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45276] [PATCH 00/26] Update sequoia-opengpg to 1.0.0 Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45276 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Hartmut Goebel Received: via spool by 45276-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45276.160821730718955 (code B ref 45276); Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 45276) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2020 15:01:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kpumo-0004vf-Vn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 10:01:47 -0500 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:56127) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kpuml-0004vN-7n for 45276@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 10:01:46 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E472F1BF20F; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:01:35 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:01:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Hartmut Goebel's message of "Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:31:52 +0100") Message-ID: <87tuskmq7l.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45276@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.31 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: C17FE940919 X-Spam-Score: -2.31 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: l2+8UMHrV+l6 Hello, Hartmut Goebel writes: > v1.0.0 was released just today. Here is the update :-) Thank you. I think the big warning in rust-dbl-0.3's description could be removed. Also, I notice you often skip builds, even though this is not required. E.g., I could build rust-pin-utils-0.1 without any problem just removing the #:skip-build keyword. I think the trend is use #:skip-build only when absolutely necessary. Finally, I wonder if replacements, e.g., rust-capnp-futures-0.10 by rust-capnp-futures-0.13, require to remove the old variable. It could be used out of the code base. WDYT? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou