From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4uys-00060b-0B for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:58:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4uyo-0006c1-4R for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:58:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49903) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4uyo-0006bk-0Y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:58:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4uyn-0001XH-Qj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:58:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26713: [PATCH] gnu: Move netsurf to web-browsers.scm. Resent-Message-ID: From: Kei Kebreau References: <20170429220942.26880-1-kei@openmailbox.org> <20170430191306.GA26169@jasmine> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:57:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170430191306.GA26169@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:13:06 -0400") Message-ID: <87shkpoehf.fsf@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 26713@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Leo Famulari writes: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 06:09:42PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: >> * gnu/packages/web.scm: Move netsurf... >> * gnu/packages/web-browsers.scm: ...here. > > This caused building Guix to fail because the glib-or-gtk build-system > module was not imported in (gnu packages web-browsers). > Oh no! :( > I planned to add that module in a followup commit, but I realized that > several other variables from (gnu packages web) need to be imported in > (gnu packages web-browsers) along with this change, and I decided to > revert the change for now. > > Can you take another look at moving this package? Will do. I'll have to adjust the qutebrowser patch for corrections to this one. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAlkGQawACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg35+xAAkd7lVBw+djEOV+qdO3jk4rTPkuyKrjNFcaXxS/+w6uFwMa7k5yGrE7nk H41/5bGzZu9ilnbU2IFm/OaLu9nZfneY+hPG+K832EyUEc1B6dPLuxe+YlZVZ56t GU4YTsZJv827pg/SmGyHZcI3pxra6ghEZUO2A3Mv84G21dSAcFUab93eq2QV8Vg/ 5Jq5mRxvB7hKKo2lA1aXNL8XyljqXySJZXfabaLEgLu2wR2//TxdOtqWenRqoWqp AUvjrvuYOmw7/v5ED4Gol97489ieIS9NatvBiErbpdgTAMhs9I68/LoWZSd1ZBFw UZimeWlT6nPgkegmYzX6AJqvcF2f7uXmnkUvnJ0TF3iwzy1doMEPPPFLXK0K+3hi bbFr/p8GAe/oCGMLbHzuM/s305g4NjvRiXhK7d4Mba8I/5xuAnWbgNFAQcFaRnRl KLZkiUrmzwVZfAiIa2eic5q5Bljs6BbePlTDmwkjFcG850/B4X+uCokRTMtgcd6I FDyy6ASNgdCN9FoOlJfizxwEhR52Wy9XyTwa03Ytw/UaI3isH8UoPiLNy7GGA4o6 Ltq2x+SSZECuuIqs4tJshbW4V7Bn6/VfvsAn+lTPOVlENYNiJRBeSHXtPXE3UqYb NG6HcgrSS/k6YaF/hS7xpekMNy9VmukyxEjpNSwGxWEiOmcwSMw= =BHai -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--