From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxbKC-0005OO-7W for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:06:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxbK6-00062H-Jk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:06:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxbK6-00062A-GV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:06:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dxbK6-0006t2-8S for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:06:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28487] [PATCH] cuirass: Add gnu-system build spec. Resent-Message-ID: From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen References: <20170917201157.9802-1-janneke@gnu.org> <20170917201157.9802-5-janneke@gnu.org> <87zi9h27q3.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv5hqr73.fsf@gnu.org> <87a81hgq5g.fsf@gnu.org> <87a81gq8dg.fsf@gnu.org> <87efqsexi4.fsf@gnu.org> <8760c3rifz.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2urz0q9.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 18:04:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r2urz0q9.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:27:58 +0200") Message-ID: <87shf6q06v.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 28487@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> (match o >> (($ ) ...) > > I would make it: > > (match o > ((? license?) > ...)) Oops, something like this was already pushed here: > Anyway, with this fixed, OK to push. Thanks, pushed with all this fixed to master as 516b53828e90018126b79e= 7600cae9aa531e06d7 Sure hope I didn't interpret the OK to push too lightly. Mentioned commit above is the second patch, the first is here http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D66bc1d2aaf74fc7e= b4ef9b3519c69bd37142ffb3 >> so I was wondering why you didn't export . Now it makes sense: >> you simply cannot use record destructors if you don't export <..> in the >> first place. For GOOPS that's a bit different, you don't have class? >> for each . > > Yes. I think the =E2=80=9Cspirit of GOOPS=E2=80=9D is that class objects= are public. Yeah...and then you have to be `careful'; not so nice come to think of it. Greetings, janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com