From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41173)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fxWdR-0003lz-5z
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:10:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fxWdK-0003jI-07
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:10:11 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41448)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1fxWdG-0003g3-LG
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:10:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fxWdG-00028s-By
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:10:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#32584] [PATCH] gnu: Add yad.
References: <20180830095152.8589-1-madalinionel.patrascu@mdc-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <20180830095152.8589-1-madalinionel.patrascu@mdc-berlin.de>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.32584.B32584.15361493538151@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:08:57 +0200
Message-ID: <87sh2oxi1y.fsf@mdc-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: 32584@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi pimi,

thanks for the update.

In this case you can avoid having to record the git commit that
corresponds to version 0.40.3 because that commit is tagged.  You can
remove the =E2=80=9Clet=E2=80=9D, keep =E2=80=9Cversion=E2=80=9D at =E2=80=
=9C0.40.3=E2=80=9D, and use =E2=80=9C(commit version)=E2=80=9D
instead of =E2=80=9C(commit commit)=E2=80=9D.

This would make the package description a little less confusing to read.

Does that make sense?

--
Ricardo