From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4mo7-0007R2-K9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:28:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4mo6-0000pT-Mt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:28:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38180) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4mo6-0000pB-5n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:28:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4mo6-0003Xv-25 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:28:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39690] [PATCH v2] gnu: Add pm_pcie_driver. Resent-Message-ID: Message-ID: <87sgj5xriz.fsf@nckx> References: <20200220135910.24500-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20200220140107.24695-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> In-reply-to: <20200220140107.24695-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:27:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via To: 39690@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Danny Milosavljevic --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Danny, Danny Milosavljevic =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > + (uri=20 > "https://www.passmark.com/downloads/pm_pcie_driver.tar.gz") Are you a paying customer? Any chance you could ask your rep for=20 a versioned link? :o) > + (license license:gpl2+))) ~/pm_pcie_driver =CE=BB grep -Eri "licen|gpl" pm_pcie_driver.c:MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); ~/pm_pcie_driver =CE=BB Sigh. Assuming for a moment that this is legal: wouldn't it be=20 gpl2-only, like Linux? LG otherwise! Thanks, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl5Ol28ACgkQ2Imw8BjF STwySQ//SZDPzRdt2UN7cky6309NNk8Vp/RMiqGnpIx0tYIkJ0lzp8lr09gqOC7T /llvG9gSdGQFhj7rGrjC1rt6cPmbxzO5GrAmBS4QTkxSupJH5U6Glqn6wyls/19c iv7VPxXeHp3KvWf+f0SZYqvteCHFPM2eiZKqK/h3DzmAJ85RB4BNyKEBT0tB/Oyj 0r0lzKYQSRb7+0hlH+Oue8ZTVdLYT4tu5O1rG0+KZh87gAvwb7XTWYrkjLxcgK1a VFG/c8pqDVeNHyTJfs9rsTpBkJ1i5hBY1B6d/1NAFFxza3vzU3yVkQ7AqXlyk+PI bClBOoCFT+oJ6rZBlfcEbGVgzdv35z/giKd0bA+GXX7G3M8wnB7pLUM8I6cs436G 5FZWOKlWnpeUzLyRXZGGhy/CYpcnzMfnrk+mgVGULRcjeWtjRS7Yu9tGfZKknFE1 Y5GJ9bXwojY+sRJAIQ5IOr9akAXw/wuMJJuJzwifinrQjmx/r0U0MhFHBVP50n7H XLHXPXWl6HO4hQxlNrYVhsrQZ6myzuhBQRZwEauq5RxSXDCEZfpdsUrKLIlGsvra RpFK22aav+mZ6U9R4YJml8WHe8Laapwf7KMyZz7EsxrClW5V62ZqJkxk4iv12UeR iaVlNLm4TmL/1n+zQPXEvn+pFTGOvCRCiR6HnsBItn3E1K0f8Uc= =iQ5K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--