From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44229)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jNzLe-0002OJ-Qu
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:42:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jNzLd-0008Kl-Uz
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:42:02 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47845)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jNzLd-0008Kh-S3
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:42:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jNzLd-0000Tb-Qz
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:42:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#40597] [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary
 tarball, rebuild instructions.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40597.B40597.15867852821781@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <0b207bae-2f18-eb06-d51b-0f0c92eb6d15@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:41:12 +0200
In-Reply-To: <0b207bae-2f18-eb06-d51b-0f0c92eb6d15@gmail.com> (Vincent
 Legoll's message of "Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:34:38 +0200")
Message-ID: <87sgh7jyfb.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
Cc: 40597@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Vincent,

Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com> skribis:

>>>From dd961656d9bd98d11ba5e38be89cd1952fefc263 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:25:57 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Mention update-guix-package in guix-binary tarball
>  rebuild instructions.
>
> * doc/guix.texi (Binary Installation): Mention 'make update-guix-package'.

I agree this needs to be documented, but I don=E2=80=99t think this is the =
right
place: =E2=80=9CBinary Installation=E2=80=9D is for users who want to insta=
ll.  Instead,
we should document it in a section explicitly targeting Guix developers,
maybe under =E2=80=9CContributing=E2=80=9D?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.