From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2MTFMyCkZF+YEwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:12:16 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id EF+nLyCkZF8iEwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:12:16 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 551759401D8 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55596 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJFFN-00088X-Tr for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:12:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJFFE-000887-9l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:12:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJFFC-0001Cc-Je for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:12:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJFFC-0007Hu-DO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#43425] [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Update to 0.3.10. Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43425 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 43425@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: code@greghogan.com Received: via spool by 43425-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43425.160043107127925 (code B ref 43425); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 43425) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2020 12:11:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41142 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJFEN-0007GL-22 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:11:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJFEI-0007Fo-5S for 43425@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:11:09 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJFEC-00015t-Kr; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:11:00 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:9d9d:97cc:d92a:8ac0] (port=52744 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kJFE6-0001ZR-Kh; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:10:59 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <87k0ws7bey.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh5n1rxo.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:10:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zh5n1rxo.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:10:11 +0200") Message-ID: <87sgbfz3n7.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: yKVN+YfaQa0F > Thanks for the updated version. Yes I guess it can happen but it's less > likely. I added your copyright and edited a bit the commit message > before applying. Turns out this patch causes 1912 package rebuilds. This is too much to go to "master" branch. This patch, as well as other patches you sent, such as the python update, shall instead target "core-updates" branch as explained here: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html. When it's the case do not hesitate to explicitly add "core-updates" to the patch title so that committers forgetting to run `guix refresh -l package`, such as myself do not choose the wrong branch :). Thanks, Mathieu