From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id MNPADvxqYWE8sgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:12:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 2PyUCfxqYWHlRwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 10:12:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB6013AC2 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 12:12:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34510 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZ9Ks-00024q-AP for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 06:12:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZ9Kk-00024c-Bj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 06:12:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZ9Kk-0006mE-3R for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 06:12:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZ9Kj-00047s-QL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 06:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#50874] [PATCH] lint: Check if HTTPS version of HTTP URL exists. Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 10:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50874 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 50874@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 50874-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50874.163377429515823 (code B ref 50874); Sat, 09 Oct 2021 10:12:01 +0000 Received: (at 50874) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2021 10:11:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52321 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZ9KJ-000478-Et for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 06:11:35 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:36496 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZ9KH-00046v-FS for 50874@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 06:11:33 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1633774287; bh=JronQ5eyINDMUY1oQQKjKzfRZnntKJQBWdEPeCUUOz0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=TwaiH+UYe2IuFJitb9P1nPmJbBSy+dIscexLakDbhDR4JKuiolYMPAMcZ5MCS6+FA Yg7gmgbq4OnRpZL7OVcuhW0KCY+VkbKe79hMNeGF9WUGKqAg5mwL265Iqs5tDdeKf7 haFRs9Q0QSLnlkmfXn6pomany31FgDoyYJIrYXAk= In-Reply-To: <87v926ldvv.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> References: <877devwj95.fsf@gnu.org> <87v926ldvv.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:11:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87sfxald81.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1633774331; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=xdCzMCaRfonabyZISsMrPLtr4kyq+FxqYm4yPF+5EWo=; b=owaI4CbALngQsr6+ZivghAKwaRmh2h1mSanSybTWeAQegfC03pVBr1Z3paRJAibSmZcvml Nc/HVhUVfmVhU3rDYILBFcCNlRyTYvdpkYfwCQJBmGj0mXkHBd49snL/sLmoyha3d9lizT vpAbyUKqqgtV3LUR5vFgPU0sezWEzwZY3NdvwKTcDBbdjUEsm7nfNa8+6knlD+qfhALmzj L0pDx4z78wQszicAEmlihnIhGZtyUN2/g/8LJmB7Ni5cNaJieFGEk0CwCnejJQhSE1Iyb0 zjGhPus3IF1GftB5r41uxvC38PHVJngoRU7ihAMNOhtYYIgnfW5apLU4yR8zeQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1633774331; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CDdMD3RZBy22ZGFWeYqbxsJtTrhfShzG+7M+rTStbbSg8lz+Fs/aeUMyhM7ngkYl5Etrwy pkYeN6VErR6HvusHs8ZzcRFehXTYr2g2O1OGB0CtDVA4Z6Hj2Ez8LOvFouDTFFd9mrCImX W77H8YtBDAZu9ccSGO5o/GFs5r8Dd+Tw8sRmNE6MjWl09tYVoLP5TSEKqlRekx0yp657tM MFXY8HPkbGArtnhmL0w0QBf6W9ZsZyXqNnhLs9SbZCh/0bPKHl9bWnFNtWxmhOVFUQi4l4 jncRCSUaI9ulniVZcRZZfRdh4bNIGYyNDvrSzTO03GZgyWr9N42Wsz/gelCRyw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=yoctocell.xyz header.s=mail header.b=TwaiH+UY; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.41 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=yoctocell.xyz header.s=mail header.b=TwaiH+UY; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=yoctocell.xyz (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BCB6013AC2 X-Spam-Score: -3.41 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: g2ROivwTmid8 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 09 2021, Xinglu Chen wrote: > On Sat, Oct 02 2021, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Xinglu Chen skribis: >> >>> * guix/lint.scm (check-if-https-uri-exists?): New procedure. >>> (check-home-page, check-source): Use it. >> >> Applied, thanks! > > Was it? I don=E2=80=99t see it in the log. > >>> I don=E2=80=99t really know how to test this while making it future-pro= of, any >>> suggestions? >> >> I don=E2=80=99t know either, since we don=E2=80=99t have an easy way to = spin up an HTTPS >> server. I think it=E2=80=99s okay to leave it as is, for lack of a bett= er idea. >> >> However, this version of the patch leads to test failures in >> tests/lint.scm (=E2=80=9CConnection refused=E2=80=9D). > > Thanks for catching this; I will look into it. Good that you didn=E2=80= =99t > apply it then. :-) Hm, I am not able to reproduce this. All the tests in =E2=80=98tests/lint.= scm=E2=80=99 pass for me. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmFhas4VHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5+GkQAI37Ey0Ovxp++dfjLaWxU/eeyDmc zTnrje2wbPQ0dPAn0Qj1aSoRQM3NleTGR56T2IcPpjLihwgajJkoAjSfLthngFM1 uGNnIGrOqfS5kh6I9RsjH0vjVgfhYCJAIdeu/NZKzCxsrsjIJ4NXbO2yOWiPsyMq baANhzScD9TXBnIBbq3JypJrlf0P/e5qtigzt5eSRdmipcAlag3nWnc4bLdYokU1 X8uZXwuLpQhrRTZ81LbXepCHNMR+YIZCHRkapblCmX/jk8VxiPSfs3LMlpUK8WCs hJ5QqLg6xn6Fm5SvgmyXeQx/MGzW5qoScO3SfB6SuGYIBo6U+euIollH4NWo48EP ZrqO+eJ5kO3om+TBHWBkE3Q6OGLtRqYiJsckLVnw0w4R/UzrHOiq1qnsYfpexcO2 HWEnJ1BYC4ZDexClZdNcM1/tedcMlng6s+Mh029DU6xN8RR4coNrz45+p1LICwj0 gTerIXFJkyQz25nnJoUKM2UAKcU/dT+hpPkbsPEvz/Ox1FAtqdZfv8hglTjb5trd Wjik4exQxGXuKrjNfykhbRIJfNtMUSHoek9fCaKseJQa6gFsqv/Hjdr2XYKGCPZm t0TaXF2KrFiY0XiAlTVhyg4qDzRxUSQAEqSmUTf0DQ3f1rOl67Pvbh556O4+jQF4 f2RmsxJnKZAV1BeJ =vokx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--