Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> skribis:

> Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On ven., 19 mai 2023 at 13:30, Michael Ford <fanquake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> -(define-public bitcoin-core-23.1
>>> +(define-public bitcoin-core-24.1
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> -    (version "23.1")
>>> +    (version "24.1")
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> -                "03k56vgk0a0wr84gpj256hvijk6iyshl85hcrx800hiznyzl5hkl"))))
>>> +                "0kmgpzknbykgwb8vd7hj3j1xxn35785gf4vii5705k6rnarks2la"))))
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> -(define-public bitcoin-core bitcoin-core-23.1)
>>> +(define-public bitcoin-core bitcoin-core-24.1)
>>
>> Out of curiosity, why are these two symbols required?  Maybe, it could
>> be nice to drop ’bitcoin-core-xy.z’ and keep only ’bitcoin-core’, no?
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> simon
>
> Hi.
> IIRC, at some point in the past we had two versions of bitcoin-core, and
> the 'bitcoin-core' variable was pointing at one of the packages. Then
> one of the versions became outdated and was removed.
> Since we now have only one version, removing the leftovers from the
> multiple package version support stuff seems like a good idea...

Hi.
Cleanup done in 24b6f94cf9b4ab97ef2eb70d05b2104a06776e62.