From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4JP8KtBF12Y04AAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:22:24 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4JP8KtBF12Y04AAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 19:22:24 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=kN9qF6sO; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=fabionatali.com header.s=gm1 header.b=TLg472Zj; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1725384144; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=le3vqy97RfxODl8aDoRWspWwxyI6wWifXhvN60HPaZo=; b=S67n32N4QV7EIPdeGORBJ9nVOjCvKiWmuQpWN6s8uI7HOyvta3O8+Kjkn4EsuoHbf15jOf XcjeRKggFpytUfAmAF12ObN7Wq1kPcU/cc3YBzLotPx6ssMSKDWQ0OrXkayEieqEKt3947 MVVv+FwQMUmFXen5K3X/795VlJ9xOU51jb6NlJbsY2cde/baSjDoZaqMflwflMX7u22O5Q UkKEH88tJ2pgZC1s6KYH3bSLsArHNUxrZ0tX+b9LPjMZqiG1Z8R/lWGy2HRvUvEu2tX1iQ Cc5fwxzjui5O9khRLpvEoUgBunDr05ueFoH5IIs8kP7Bre5P+fyikaEGg+dKdQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=kN9qF6sO; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=fabionatali.com header.s=gm1 header.b=TLg472Zj; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1725384144; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=XTuGYfsxnoi6NxfwpPnBP2FKA7HtTPip4+7OoyfgclHxb4FET1JyRSJIlehI4AOvfAxxBW vsap+SAYRfk/5ilRemV2LD0pi8qSo1IFQSUZqpw0kAmLEXoVjRfkmMFbVdlx0u1xLuJr5s gOZPp6+hNcLc3s3KQxr4KinRdvUoBfnzN4n5KH+viaMH3PFrEbZMWNlHdN0Tc1MXw7urj1 isr+5dyesZFqwKY/X5P2WTiuR7Ovyc2x08RxKicZd5rxvN1SDfRU8wp3N5/0fjo65NmpSj IHiIKN5Jj3Xc89nlVWzcgVXXh76XkGdKgcMv7/WPnWhaE6U/SKNInjdr7sZ8wA== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33E9D3E7F8 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 19:22:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1slWdS-0004LF-Hs; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:44:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1slWdN-00042C-NB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:44:01 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1slWdL-0007ok-TF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:44:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:In-Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject; bh=le3vqy97RfxODl8aDoRWspWwxyI6wWifXhvN60HPaZo=; b=kN9qF6sOrgCeQCWUKvopNbo6tTkaS2DWwAy/RPUNTPOVSb9JsQKzpwKQO92IXfs9GDBStcL/g8e9dzFnIH8ToVuGPcM7vdICiqxFql+RhCnCsWcff5/nTkZ7f10sZ8v7SbwpCOJgyvp4i369SWd30hg0t/+WF6JwDaiXV1QZO1eO/5R19YkxB5gwn/hkqwjxbfcjOcxhQ+ur0c15PToqD7zP+xOUAcCzZHq72NQc8n1hufZWJU3pHuw2WPshDgnWc+3qcVouzBfR0hX0Fo+1fqcuwcCk1x6fvH5IxZ/dV9NP4ytx7lVsEeBBrpJC2FNd5UKhNFbPai5EDyYfhquLZg==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1slWeM-0001Uy-9x for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#71639] [PATCH WIP 0/5] Improve on restic-backup-service References: Resent-From: Fabio Natali Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71639 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 71639@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Richard Sent , paul , Fabio Natali Received: via spool by 71639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71639.17253818575697 (code B ref 71639); Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:45:02 +0000 Received: (at 71639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2024 16:44:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60731 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1slWdd-0001Tp-3M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:44:17 -0400 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:44303) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1slWdZ-0001TX-TK for 71639@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:44:15 -0400 Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8F24C0003; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 16:43:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fabionatali.com; s=gm1; t=1725381785; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=le3vqy97RfxODl8aDoRWspWwxyI6wWifXhvN60HPaZo=; b=TLg472ZjfFL97+zTeIy3tJbnr+XuHYiqUKwQC71X9vZ9Im6pDjGoecmWEvKlvxOazNbVxi Hee0OvDKTpA7gMAFjP+Pno4L2PV85l+XCaLnB57earrLrvRlznkfHws5bBpIuI8cvajkjs gap2GE7DrpuyVewXVxGL5wXACh84jCEVXNWRnx+UxaMH7A7e/wwe0LGOnb1Jj/yPqHN+b1 +okxnDBqnIWQbkem5/ATohUCp+GvSWvwqb9u6/jzjoPn+h5hB2xfh8mDo4CRUYhMFUeybz bMx2NrljFiJ3ksmfqLjXy4vK3iAmySg6uzwMTFCEvJa71tB5hC579/L5DMcDkA== In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:43:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87seugelig.fsf@fabionatali.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-GND-Sasl: me@fabionatali.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Fabio Natali X-ACL-Warn: , Fabio Natali via Guix-patches From: Fabio Natali via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 33E9D3E7F8 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.07 X-Spam-Score: -7.07 X-TUID: 4U/DfzlhzJsg > I apologize for blocking this issue with my proposal. I think Fabio's > proposal of splitting the changes in this patch is the best way > forward, if you agree as well Richard. I submitted [0] to refactor the > restic-guix procedure in a way that it can support many different > commands. Hi Giacomo, Thanks for this! > 1. Improve the restic backup system service [...] > 2. Refactor the restic-guix function [...] > 3. Allow for repositories to be initialized with a restic-guix init [...] I think this is a perfectly sensible plan. For what it's worth, I've provided some little feedback around point 2 as part of #72803. As a further point, I also think we should manage to update Restic itself to 0.17.0 (while we're still at 0.9.6 which was released in Nov 2019). With such an out-of-date package, the service also risks to loose a little bit of its value. I've just sent a quick follow-up to #63019 in the hope that we might be able to get this sorted soon. Thanks, cheers, Fabio.