From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32922) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cychR-0007G8-Nq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:14:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cychO-0003Xi-I8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:14:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cychO-0003XY-FN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:14:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cychO-0004g4-BH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:14:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26344: [PATCH] WIP libxsl Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: References: From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 13:13:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87r30wpnl0.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Catonano Cc: 26344-done@debbugs.gnu.org Catonano writes: > 2017-04-03 0:12 GMT+02:00 Catonano : > >> The tests don't work and I don't know which bsd license this thing has. >> Please help >> >> > Ok, so this is Ricardo's version. Thanks, Ricardo I pushed a modified version to master with commit ca8f3f9a510705a99f5f4a6b66c24c9e44a98d7d. I removed the configure flags because I haven’t seen any tool of a conflicting name in my store. If users find conflicts with tools they should rather use separate profiles. I also added a comment to explain why the bootstrapping is required, and I changed the synopsis and description slightly. Thanks for the contribution! -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net