Brendan Tildesley writes: > On 2017-05-16 03:00, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Brendan Tildesley writes: >> >>> From efcfd192fb22ab36054d41ba02ae3e5e32a9239c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Brendan Tildesley >>> Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 23:34:59 +1000 >>> Subject: [PATCH 06/12] gnu: calibre: Undelete GPLv2 icon file. >>> >>> gnu/package/ebook.scm (calibre): Undelete GPLv2 icon file from openoffice >>> (see thumbnail.py). >> [...] >> >>> - ;; Remove non-free or doubtful code, see >>> - ;; https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-02/msg00478.html >>> + ;; Remove nonfree unrar and bundled dependencies. >>> (modules '((guix build utils))) >>> (snippet >>> '(begin >>> (delete-file-recursively "src/calibre/ebooks/markdown") >>> (delete-file-recursively "src/unrar") >>> - (delete-file "src/odf/thumbnail.py") >> I peeked in the git repository (not the release tarball) and this file >> still says "License: Freeware" as the linked thread discusses. Am I >> missing something? > > If you look in thumbnail.py it's self, it says the icon is from > http://www.zwahlendesign.ch/en/node/20 Which has a .zip file, containing > the icons and a LICENSE.txt file stating they are GPLv2 I downloaded the icons from that page, and the picture embedded in thumbnail.py is not there. However, there is one *very* similar. See attached. Since this appears to be a derivative work, but with a different license ("freeware"), I'm not sure if we can include it. Are we in a position to enforce the GPL like that? Maybe we could track down the commit that added it and ask the author? I've applied the other patches, thanks a lot for this unbundling work!