From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54827)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dkdIl-00040Q-KP
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 17:35:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dkdIk-0006Ko-LO
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 17:35:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43129)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dkdIk-0006Kk-HZ
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 17:35:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dkdIk-0005lD-A6
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 17:35:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#27850] gnu: mpi: openmpi: Don't enable thread-multiple
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27850.D27850.150352405822077@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <87wp6thqjc.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
	<87379c4oxs.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87o9s0bhro.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
	<87lgn3skmm.fsf@inria.fr>
	<87tw1r9sss.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
	<87bmnzxk50.fsf@inria.fr>
	<874ltr9hhs.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
	<87o9r9t5yy.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8wyh77z.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 23:34:04 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87h8wyh77z.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk> (Dave Love's message
	of "Wed, 23 Aug 2017 12:08:32 +0100")
Message-ID: <87r2w2j7eb.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Dave Love <fx@gnu.org>
Cc: 27850-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Dave Love <fx@gnu.org> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

[...]

>> I went ahead and applied the patch you posted, minus the extra outputs,
>
> What's the problem with a runtime output?

It=E2=80=99s mostly that this should be a separate patch, as discussed earl=
ier.

It=E2=80=99s not a problem per se as long as it does help reduce the size of
what people commonly install, which is not obvious to me.

>>>> What do you have in mind for SLURM?
>>>
>>> There's integration with SLURM (--with-slurm), PBS/Torque, and LSF (or,
>>> I guess, Open Lava in the free world).  I don't know much about them,
>>> but they build MCA modules.  Unlike the gridengine support, they link
>>> against libraries for the resource managers, so you want them to be
>>> add-ons which are only installed when required (not like the Fedora
>>> packaging).
>>
>> I see.  I suppose we could make them separate outputs to avoid the
>> overhead, if that=E2=80=99s justified?
>
> Yes, I think so.  It's probably best if someone does it who uses those
> resource managers and can test the result.

OK, I may give it a try at a later point.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.