From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48735)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dxUBt-0000kf-LM
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 04:29:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dxUBq-0005Et-H4
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 04:29:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55450)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dxUBq-0005Ei-DO
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 04:29:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dxUBq-0004xo-78
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 04:29:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#28487] [PATCH] cuirass: Add gnu-system build spec.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28487.B28487.150658731719049@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20170917201157.9802-1-janneke@gnu.org>
	<20170917201157.9802-5-janneke@gnu.org> <87zi9h27q3.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87mv5hqr73.fsf@gnu.org> <87a81hgq5g.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87a81gq8dg.fsf@gnu.org> <87efqsexi4.fsf@gnu.org>
	<8760c3rifz.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:27:58 +0200
In-Reply-To: <8760c3rifz.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Wed, 27
	Sep 2017 22:32:32 +0200")
Message-ID: <87r2urz0q9.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>, 28487@debbugs.gnu.org

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:

> As an aside: Interesting, I've been using GOOPS a lot with match and we h=
ave
> standardised on only matching class/record type, like so
>
>     (match o
>       (($ <license>) ...)

I would make it:

  (match o
    ((? license?)
     ...))

> so I was wondering why you didn't export <license>.  Now it makes sense:
> you simply cannot use record destructors if you don't export <..> in the
> first place.  For GOOPS that's a bit different, you don't have class?
> for each <class>.

Yes.  I think the =E2=80=9Cspirit of GOOPS=E2=80=9D is that class objects a=
re public.

Ludo=E2=80=99.