From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1esFLx-0000Vi-OP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 17:10:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1esFLu-0006f0-IG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 17:10:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1esFLu-0006ev-Es for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 17:10:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1esFLu-0006wt-4j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 17:10:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30459] [PATCH 06/11] services: certbot: Get certbot to run non-interactively. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20180214213504.29984-1-clement@lassieur.org> <20180214213504.29984-6-clement@lassieur.org> <87606vvecp.fsf@fastmail.com> <874lmc4mz4.fsf@lassieur.org> <874lm9b00c.fsf@fastmail.com> <87inao4umt.fsf@lassieur.org> <87fu5g6d3a.fsf@gnu.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Message-ID: <87r2p0g6dw.fsf@lassieur.org> In-reply-to: <87fu5g6d3a.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 23:09:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 30459-done@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès writes: > Clément Lassieur skribis: > >> I pushed the series as is in the master branch, because it changes the >> API and it's better that the potential users use the new API as soon as >> possible. (And it works anyway.) I'll add a patch implementing the >> certbot-activation as a Shepherd service. > > Awesome. > > Remember to close the bug by emailing NNN-done@debbugs.gnu.org as I’m > doing here. :-) I didn't close it on purpose because I planned to add a new patch this week in this thread (to fix the activation). But I'll send it in a new thread. You're right: it's probably easier to keep track of things this way. Clément