From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hb5Qs-0002RN-Mk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:45:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hb5Qr-0000Tn-QL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:45:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48613) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hb5Qr-0000Tf-Nk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:45:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hb5Qr-00035Q-KE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:45:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#36162] [PATCH 0/4] Add 'remote-eval' Resent-Message-ID: From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) References: <875zpgrjqf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87h88x7pni.fsf@gnu.org> <871s01l4c2.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87k1dtj6vr.fsf_-_@sdf.lonestar.org> <87k1dqvrlh.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:43:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k1dqvrlh.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:52:10 +0200") Message-ID: <87r27ybyhy.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 36162@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Tests are supposed to be deterministic, so as such, it makes sense for > tests to be normal derivations, as is currently the case. Makes sense. I actually hadn't realized that the Guix test suite (those run with 'check' rather than 'check-system') were also derivations until you mentioned it. It seems like looking at the implementation there would give me a better idea of how to structure my tests. > In that spirit, we should instead tweak so that we > can instruct it to build an autonomous VM with its own store. I like that idea. There's a 'system-qemu-image/shared-store-script', but no 'system-qemu-image-script', so I'll have to take what I did for my test suite experiments and turn it into something proper. > OTOH, we could also have =E2=80=98container-eval=E2=80=99, similar to =E2= =80=98remote-eval=E2=80=99, > which would be useful for effectful code, such as code that needs to > interact with the daemon. Food for thought! 'container' in the sense of 'guix environment' containers? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEa1VJLOiXAjQ2BGSm9Qb9Fp2P2VoFAl0BHZkACgkQ9Qb9Fp2P 2VpurQ//U10agMvsgfPKxrKpSbi/k2YdW30iMo1fWpweK0MiMMM/nc/qqg/5UpCY w3+pzs3kdw5VP0LRySTk19tykQCZujBRAO8fK+1uO6QOhYDV+Cj8h7Y1FOqV5vWE NwwuaLlryZhoGw8ASNTni9CVp9FDpEW9u6c5k2g30Ei9GXB8G6tW+200BD3G5to2 CbABJZwVrYiak7lwhMpH+yJMAeOqFvWqv2x58BMU1A+x3qi6iq0T9UT38DsA+fXM Lr1iibIxgE3T2A0BMj5vqFHTEiBYFxnuYl+CXOY0LrAQ5BeZTYwZDhBs/zpAXpq/ XHWBThGBb7kDH3I+uyw2qhJEFF3usI5vF5ZzenzOtNbQDHi6SgXJVlqsRQGYtkbI UseJtEyvnGrsww3FkvmJvAvAc0EvfFvGIpq74zRnnErW1WN3yFZHdHc8DOeLbAtB tYPinwlhyRzKwqkWLao5ecDPPSU3tYHRuAWMT4b8HEH0K0l5f/D90qYEWQzlMJiS u1E7BPX9gvPF/+ck4PKVeuCb+HklzjRDYEmnv29wa/IPykC0m+z28Ba7uQ6w98sx XoPGXwZvDIezWJudVPHALIA8Y0REn7jr0F5hDVJCEodbNX1uggM+jY+2VeojC3F8 G2SXzH1ldk2NTYXtxngrclZ/Tu89wHQfbepdRWv4nX7ZodGPHSI= =8MFm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--