From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ismoi-0005ve-2V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 07:03:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ismog-0004cu-Nz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 07:03:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ismog-0004ck-Kf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 07:03:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ismog-0002oO-Hx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 07:03:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39142] Update USB_ModeSwitch. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20200115124810.j3myokleoa7le3sq@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87sgkdovdm.fsf@cbaines.net> <20200118125238.3423c25d@scratchpost.org> From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <20200118125238.3423c25d@scratchpost.org> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:02:46 +0000 Message-ID: <87r1zxotuh.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 39142@debbugs.gnu.org, pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi, > > On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 11:29:41 +0000 > Christopher Baines wrote: > >> 1: https://guix-patches-data.cbaines.net/compare?base_commit=9edae6c05cd879393d59702f033f4c3ccce30dba&target_commit=0115c829cc1021b01b1686c5d28a7f6004390c83 > > Very nice! Thanks :) > In general, I suggest to also list license changes. Whether we like it or > not, in practice those happen and it's important to know (especially to know > when they stay the same). So, the Guix Data Service does know what licenses are associated with a package. I guess it could list packages where that's changed on the main comparison page, is that what you're referring to? In my mind at least, the primary issue when reviewing packages is making sure the license list for the package corresponds with the actual licenses that apply to the contents. That's a little harder, as you'd have to download the source tarball, and run licensecheck or something similar, but hopefully that can be automated at some point! Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl4i8+ZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XeYEw/+PoB4qYWm/bpW7Or6oRKyj5M1rXWZx58f1RMxRhdPJlO+WDSUl6Bqz7rr +Q7VE9+OCC0L9YTRNUPalPMrR6GmxG8STW+Ff+H8sLK6cMuFwOMxOfTdaet8JwFW ha9huyheL+KPnAI7xKf1R0Iu7HD+2aZA4qQFZYsWtKiwUqve7FdbonEssQddFI9W 33eopZpUornreFRjGvTeBSg4+WDLLwlCtbEVsuJbFGguHwNOHAmz2M75jp5HVCsk AdXdw+soan0rn34nkhWc+5fASeWErxtr3JIeBpy336DpSWn/ttzQs+Ukke2dyEK8 xFG8yLGdy0QP1b1Wtc83lz8dDiE0VrmTqBHQFdNf1p5tYSMQ/t4JdvmGOpAPwrmq X+I6gc0hqyRpB0vIf93WuF9F+eCv/D8n1HQ6n+BubFNDfMioWLYw4xLvEBfrxwjj 4gyIGxP8tvKn3Gja+wKYkfbbZ8T4RlzuW0/IVJsW16AGiBrgGH1JA1m1ortHaxLq F/Tlg2walCkRl1ZUinA5h0yZFrRmhmjsi8bYWsqFIjfvUaCWNQJnJl3DztfK62B+ Jy5ZJwlXCQomp6iLGqS+oOPMYW+AGXJaix9trbOZKIM+9dPPrXXNc3c1nVd7i1W9 MgRsZbAeDWF2TjTfjd0/A7i94jv+FjPn10HD/xHqQTTb0LYWysk= =QRnO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--