From: pinoaffe <pinoaffe@airmail.cc>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Cc: 50755@debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Subject: [bug#50755] [PATCH v3] import: Generate list of importers based on available modules
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:17:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1d6zdcj.fsf@airmail.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a78030ec4daefc13a4ca7c6b9502e4660b127bf6.camel@telenet.be>
Maxime Devos writes:
> These numbers turn out to be misleading, because 'scheme-modules'
> (indirectly called from all-modules) calls 'resolve-interface' on every module
> name. For a module name, the first 'resolve-module' incurs disk I/O and some
> CPU for loading the module, but the second 'resolve-module' on the same module
> name would be free, as the module is already loaded.
okay, the first incantation of
(time (for-each (lambda (_)
(delete-duplicates (filter-map (lambda (module)
(match (module-name module)
(`(guix scripts import ,importer)
(symbol->string importer))
(#t #f)))
(all-modules (map (lambda (entry)
`(,entry . "guix/scripts/import"))
%load-path)))))
(iota 1)))
on a "fresh" guix repl on my system results in
clock utime stime cutime cstime gctime
1.28 0.76 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.16
which is indeed a significant amount of time, though I don't think it'd
be much of an issue considering that it's not likely that users will run
lots of `guix import` shell commands in rapid succession.
kind regards,
pinoaffe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-30 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-23 12:24 [bug#50755] [PATCH] import: Generate list of importers based on available modules pinoaffe
2021-09-23 18:07 ` Sarah Morgensen
2021-09-23 21:17 ` pinoaffe
2021-09-23 21:19 ` [bug#50755] [PATCH v2] " pinoaffe
2021-09-27 14:28 ` zimoun
2021-09-27 18:27 ` pinoaffe
2021-09-27 18:20 ` [bug#50755] [PATCH v3] " pinoaffe
2021-09-27 20:09 ` zimoun
2021-09-28 9:51 ` Maxime Devos
2021-09-28 14:39 ` pinoaffe
2021-09-29 20:59 ` Maxime Devos
2021-09-30 8:17 ` pinoaffe [this message]
2021-09-30 8:37 ` Maxime Devos
2021-10-11 11:51 ` zimoun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r1d6zdcj.fsf@airmail.cc \
--to=pinoaffe@airmail.cc \
--cc=50755@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=maximedevos@telenet.be \
--cc=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).