From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id sNapEI73oWHFDwEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 10:17:02 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 2PduDI73oWHRFgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:17:02 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9202C33093 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 10:17:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55136 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqtpM-0004iQ-Oy for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 04:17:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqtoR-0003hj-9K for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 04:16:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqtoQ-0006So-Vv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 04:16:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqtoQ-0003G0-SC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 04:16:02 -0500 Subject: bug#52075: [PATCH 3/4] gnu: Add python-notmuch2. Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 52075 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Jack Hill Cc: 52075-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Tanguy LE CARROUR Mail-Followup-To: 52075@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, tanguy@bioneland.org Received: via spool by 52075-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D52075.163800451912450 (code D ref 52075); Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 52075-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2021 09:15:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32917 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqtni-0003Eh-UO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 04:15:19 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:57349) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqtnf-0003EI-FB for 52075-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 04:15:16 -0500 Received: (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BCC4E0007; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:15:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <20211124100016.21905-1-tanguy@bioneland.org> <20211124100016.21905-3-tanguy@bioneland.org> <87fsrlsv81.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <163775787053.3163.3334445524894222634@localhost> <87y25dqy08.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 10:15:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Jack Hill's message of "Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:41:53 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: <87r1b2ot7p.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1638004621; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-to:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=fyIaJACbxCP3a5wWGwd4EAehDTcZt6UXa9Qz/eMV5Pg=; b=I8gA9Yl/c6KtAUh/mweAViP69DnLTWBvAniRia2wkyPKUu7bqCUjoAOZMZoYJZE6gk76x0 uQzmjhS+lqmTTOZRBqnyGpaJbIoBJIF4N+QjLig0Y3KMN62yrRDVViH5M7pSVkFw5qDzqT N5jWxNRHvZfLPTX2WPixjirnunXczje0xy1B5qgts/fBJu1+i4081gMJp4BYWBfec+b/qo 8ORzvBed6BTeS9A0Z4/f0MsPHTXjCmzBzxLjL25tVycHYc4TsboZGWtOMPb7YEoYm/w2cF NIXDN9twfgIxXPTwa54Egek33hC/z2AhKJ5JXV84cCQFr/ZJglP7959xrURBCQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1638004621; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Kr5LCjpHc0H/v+PoqCXHVKKSntl/gtNIuwFrWohuDNxdZn7+EnghkAyDtnHcq7J8v59XpG /rxblUMctNV6ougzTu6txAUjxl4Ofmakj08PV4wJxmveO0nmV2xExwtlOmu1WgIG/u9FhB 0NMsWRvTSSmvUkS74xbQYAflGuvaPj3qMkWiEiclVX1TLCZjeZzqhUxXLVqu2eBC5Tj/N3 Xe0FAFIF+AIvFrSk0N2nyhldIUzg1dObPdSbAhAU4aolC8fWVLK9MrDu8kIaiWwegxQ8sv TBl7TaCyeoQlFwgFKJBF7ZCibYVEswSqB83AxN9+eXPqtOhVjSSkh8cXTvlIXg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.00 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9202C33093 X-Spam-Score: -3.00 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: p+NNOv77WNuE Hello, Jack Hill writes: > It is possible that my concern was misplaced. My thinking was that if > the two bindings were logically separate projects, rather than being > variations on the same code, we should keep them logically separate in > Guix even if they are superficially similar. However, it might not be > a logically separate project, and that might not be the right way to > think about it anyway. They are probably internally separate, but they do share superficial parts. The Guix shortcut is only concerned about the latter, IMO. > I don't have an objection to the version using inheritance. I applied the patch set. Thanks to Tanguy for it, and to you for the feedback! > I am still curious in learning about the differences between the two > packages if only for my own edification. I cannot help here, unfortunately. > Hopefully that clarifies, and sorry for adding noise to this review. No problem! I think you raise an interesting question: does inheritance in Guix imply strong internal dependency between the project inheriting and the one being inherited? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou