From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id SHpqNyHHN2WLvgAAauVa8A:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 15:31:14 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id SHpqNyHHN2WLvgAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 15:31:14 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B4A14281A for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 15:31:13 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1698154273; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=q2Fh3XuFoN9dyNdbmg1bULRX7aBzjqdHLU6iLsPuv3KzJWvt0h8b8QVZPdqYrJzLWFJfJG S/F6zHxHoO1eMd8KPYJNbdKrjmqLs1JPJ+lN6SQB8lNzT+Fnb9TGKTCMa+d8K7y28oT0ZQ 3rwma/zkYV9W0LsriZfLJKqFPCQDtaMzX4apTM7VNWVooa8lxzkFVsaCKHRpFccS4IdL1U lwKVgM2CjnrBvPIu9dRUGI1C7nMDWumDQ5pecuk9JaMs0AaDKMb1RkZ5pkKO9wvoePruet 7DvRxYJpr3zU8MhKqWQPEk/hUgBUvGFScm+ttN8OrBEgH0+PhLakK2gE1DYBcQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1698154273; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=xOhX+9VTqHYrPZH6bxWQdoWML1ZKIcfbzj0kZMH4Tvw=; b=jiuSJwWwv0lCRGkLzQQgTVApskVajlbI/gSNp2FUp8DDCJe9GfcG2ibuNZw7QJsmBw8iIo sVNOqwnQ/tqRWitLu295l1gkS+poKmvavYq1b4hnSt45M22oAOp1yIQ8wi1C8KNV0pxfbt 54yC5KWyaJrWyQlKO8tw9CxJHXi6MN9ZZ9fCIkwehBidR6vkrn+drgUoGIhsBfuJwZgeVF my+/vGI+2X9se+ts8XJVW+PcIt75QdBdLFmcWLlz4MSx4RXh7AyAV2ELXSLWIMPnXWL+pX gTgRQkL8jORwThkJb7eBtoycQld0dCQmAuXfz40ZIHEix5Sb4ChM7Ssb1hG44A== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvHIo-0006zR-KZ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:18:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvHGv-00041q-4t for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:16:38 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvHGr-00020L-6Z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:16:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvHHK-0005As-BR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#66143] [PATCH]: Update emacs-slime and sbcl-slime-swank to 2.28-0.1e4b741 Resent-From: Christopher Baines Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 13:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66143 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo patch To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Cc: 66143-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 66143-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D66143.169815336819804 (code D ref 66143); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 13:17:02 +0000 Received: (at 66143-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2023 13:16:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53449 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvHGR-00059M-LS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:16:07 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:42976) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvHGN-00059A-Bc for 66143-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:16:06 -0400 Received: from localhost (46.183.103.17.relaix.net [46.183.103.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFA6A27BBE2; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:15:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (imp-tz0161 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 901c7164; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 13:15:25 +0000 (UTC) References: <87fs375jy2.fsf@gmail.com> <87il7y7efi.fsf@cbaines.net> <87pm25l2ga.fsf@gmail.com> <875y3uob1g.fsf@gmail.com> <87jzrhaxg7.fsf@gmail.com> <877cne7tml.fsf@kitej> <87v8awa32o.fsf@gmail.com> <87a5s8kxa5.fsf@kitej> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.5; emacs 28.2 From: Christopher Baines Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:08:28 +0100 In-reply-to: <87a5s8kxa5.fsf@kitej> Message-ID: <87r0lk2mc4.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.94 X-Spam-Score: -7.94 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9B4A14281A X-TUID: kPkRcRvVVphN --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > Patches applied as d62a613bcff726dfc835313064228e7bc3b7cda6 and > following, with a completed commit message for the second patch. I did raise an objection earlier in the thread to these changes being merged. Not discussing (or even acknowledging issues raised) is unhelpful. Given what I've now read from upstream [1], I think it can be justified in this case, but this is independent from the above. I think we still should record reasons for deviating from the norm in comments (and commit messages if useful). 1: https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/792 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmU3w2tfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XdhhxAAmVFpAQ40xy8Un0jilP9vHAVPB+S7SVg/ GhpX9UGAPlmB1gK02MFqc02S6ZLJt1cEl5muNaabpATVtCagpuJItFaf+E1/SH5S qm3+1P/LVLlNUErzatZ8rtgbor8aCbPZaqPPfHea+MGu/Wkl7T2w4StGOfhOY4d3 dXYi2DxQ+TNs7axCnuYBqoBMy2jIWjIDBWtk3k9fgOHGwjk7XvtSSQKcc/Da3mlj NEgNAIdbUDF8KWswD2yCxRr/coxte10DlyyczCxdy5o/keJixBtgWEVJ7YDvf26u +fbinw2cdfQJ3/BcfltvKQuPaAKCD9FX/TfWODo+rQob9lz3Mdun7raSY/T8Dvpg hAcYc54enGFD549gfaCr90Uh/nuQkYTfK/iQNSuK5atOoSHhMA/lMus7iX58nCzE dsBN7YgsXOeje54RBdldtEKuAYsonxOg88G7i8bC3x7+/5szmRsOxQWOog3WbFOR WaRre0ovGGUwCkZJrjV0Pmx49deYhn1ku2GLNCe9PUwysCz+TgPtMgM2XzbzipD5 N4Ws0zzA+cHDj2PkIWNeb/mXZegqt2iDL+2TmamFwXhEyjAv7NvD4JkE5X5ekdal 0DAQtuHnhUKd8/ugL6nh2t6CSZ9uFH9OlynaTe85YmuBQnByk554kEnQ2RD8tw1G j00xg7IUPVM= =1141 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--