From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXLqN-0001xf-Ch for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 01:51:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXLqJ-0006ZB-DG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 01:51:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55843) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXLqI-0006YV-W0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 01:51:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXLqI-0005Jw-GS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 01:51:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29976] [PATCH] gnu: Add git-subtree. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20180104122635.7097-1-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> <20180104180228.GA9302@jasmine.lan> <87r2r548lp.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <20180104214951.GA12186@jasmine.lan> <20180104215445.GA13254@jasmine.lan> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-Reply-To: <20180104215445.GA13254@jasmine.lan> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 07:50:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87po6o4x5c.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 29976@debbugs.gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 04:49:51PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >> > I just wanted to use git-subtree without having to rebuild all packages >> > that use git for fetching the sources. >> > >> > We could make this part of the regular git package, but only on >> > (the next) core-updates. >> >> I didn't realize this was an issue. We update the Git package whenever >> there is a new release. > > Thinking about it for another minute, shouldn't those packages not need > to be rebuilt, since origins are fixed-output derivations? Yes, you are right. I didn’t think of this. So, I’m going to add this as a phase to the git package. -- Ricardo