Hello Pierre,

Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois@gmx.com> writes:

> What about the pure CL source version, should I remove that one too? I
> guess it doesn't hurt to keep it.

I'm not agree to remove it because I don't understand a build system.
The build farm succeeds to “build” it as I am.  According to a build
system documentation:

     Additionally, the corresponding source package should be labeled
     using the same convention as python packages (see *note Python
     Modules::), using the ‘cl-’ prefix.

https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Build-Systems.html

I think you might want to start a discussion on guix-devel.

> Here's the updated patch.  I've removed ecl-stumpwm but kept the pure
> source cl-stumpwm variant.

LGTM with minor changes in commit message,
pushed as 4b193da3f959244112a85f996d630aa1ed6d0902

Thanks,
Oleg.