From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32791) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5nrb-0000x0-Tm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 04:43:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5ngi-0000NM-Lm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 04:32:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5ngf-0000Mf-UZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 04:32:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h5ngf-0003yP-Ni for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 04:32:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#34613] Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: Add prometheus.) Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20190222114537.1431-1-boskovits@gmail.com> <87k1h5rr3k.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0mvay1m.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:31:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits"'s message of "Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:33:24 +0100") Message-ID: <87pnqotwhd.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: 34613@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt Hi, G=C3=A1bor Boskovits skribis: > 2019. m=C3=A1rc. 13., Sze 11:06 d=C3=A1tummal Ludovic Court=C3=A8s ezt =C3=ADrta: [...] >> The thing is, Glyphicons does seem to be non-free, so if it ends up >> being included one way or another, we have a problem. I would have >> expected Debian to provide replacement icons or something like that. >> > In the case it is included, as part of bootstrap, it is under the apache > license, because of a special agreement, that when it is part of bootstrap > it is dual licensed to this effect. My current evaluation is that it is ok > to include the package as is. OK, sounds good. Thank you for explaining! Ludo=E2=80=99.