Julien Lepiller writes: > Le 12 juillet 2019 23:32:47 GMT+02:00, Arne Babenhauserheide a écrit : >>* gnu/packages/geo.scm (gdal): add python support >>--- >> gnu/packages/geo.scm | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >>diff --git a/gnu/packages/geo.scm b/gnu/packages/geo.scm >>index 4cccd97643..3e2ec04b53 100644 >>--- a/gnu/packages/geo.scm >>+++ b/gnu/packages/geo.scm >>@@ -537,6 +537,8 @@ development.") >> (build-system gnu-build-system) >> (arguments >> `(#:tests? #f >>+ ;; validating runpath does not work yet for Python, so skip >>this phase. >>+ #:validate-runpath? #f >> #:configure-flags >> (let-syntax ((with (syntax-rules () >> ((_ option input) >>@@ -544,6 +546,10 @@ development.") >> (assoc-ref %build-inputs input)))))) >> (list >> ;; TODO: --with-pcidsk, --with-pcraster >>+ ;; Add $libdir to the RUNPATH of all the executables. >>+ (string-append "LDFLAGS=-Wl,-rpath=" %output "/apps/.libs") >>+ (string-append "LD_RUN_PATH=" %output "/apps/.libs") >>+ (string-append "LD_LIBRARY_PATH=" %output "/apps/.libs") >> (with "--with-freexl" "freexl") >> (with "--with-libjson-c" "json-c") >> (with "--with-png" "libpng") >>@@ -553,13 +559,27 @@ development.") >> (with "--with-libtiff" "libtiff") >> (with "--with-geotiff" "libgeotiff") >> (with "--with-libz" "zlib") >>- "--with-pcre")) >>+ "--with-pcre" >>+ "--with-python")) >> #:phases >> (modify-phases %standard-phases >> (add-before 'build 'fix-path >> (lambda _ >> (substitute* "frmts/mrf/mrf_band.cpp" >>- (("\"../zlib/zlib.h\"") ""))))))) >>+ (("\"../zlib/zlib.h\"") "")))) >>+ (add-after >>+ 'unpack 'patch-test-shebangs >>+ (lambda _ >>+ (substitute* '("apps/GNUmakefile") >>+ (("/bin/sh") (which "sh"))) >>+ #t)) >>+ (add-after >>+ 'unpack 'patch-test-shebangs >>+ (lambda _ >>+ (substitute* '("GDALmake.opt.in") >>+ (("LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@") (string-append "LDFLAGS >>= @LDFLAGS@ -Wl,-rpath=" %output "/apps -Wl,-rpath=" %output >>"/apps/.libs"))) >>+ #t) >>+ )))) > > Could you rename that phase to something like 'patch-rpath? Is it needed since you already pass it to the configure? Renamed, see the new patch :-) I did not get this to work without it. >> (inputs >> `(("freexl" ,freexl) >> ("geos" ,geos) >>@@ -572,6 +592,11 @@ development.") >> ("libwebp" ,libwebp) >> ("pcre" ,pcre) >> ("zlib" ,zlib))) >>+ (native-inputs >>+ `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config))) >>+ (propagated-inputs >>+ `(("python" ,python) >>+ ("python-setuptools" ,python-setuptools))) > > Is setuptools really necessary at runtime? Can we patch gdal so to embed python's store path? I'd prefer not to propagate it. I’m not really sure why it is, but I did not get it working without. Activating Python-support was harder than I thought (but I need it working for a project on a deadline). >> (home-page "http://www.gdal.org/") >> (synopsis "Raster and vector geospatial data format library") >>(description "GDAL is a translator library for raster and vector >>geospatial >>-- >>2.22.0 > > Thank you! Thank you for reviewing!