From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34039) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jAApo-0002SC-4L for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 06:08:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAApn-0004nB-0O for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 06:08:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAApm-0004mz-UA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 06:08:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAApm-00084k-PN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 06:08:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39945] [PATCH 0/1] Introducing 'with-parameters' for gexp dynamic binding Resent-Message-ID: References: <20200306104108.19503-1-ludo@gnu.org> From: Mathieu Othacehe In-reply-to: <20200306104108.19503-1-ludo@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:06:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87pndpeo8d.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 39945@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: ludo@gnu.org Hey! > Thoughts? > > Besides, =E2=80=98with-parameters=E2=80=99 is the dual of what was discus= sed at > . Super nice! Maybe you could add a test-case involving %current-target-system but otherwise this LGTM. Do you think we could use this to get around this issue we discussed there: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-12/msg00099.html. Thanks, Mathieu