From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43319) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJ5Lv-0002Yw-V3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:06:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJ5Lu-0006tb-1U for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:06:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJ5Lt-0006tO-Qt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:06:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJ5Lt-0006OY-MO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:06:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#40326] Remove deprecated packages Resent-Message-ID: From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <206415b91c8972f54a8c9e04fd330a50@disroot.org> <20200330180138.GC6896@jasmine.lan> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:05:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200330180138.GC6896@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:01:38 -0400") Message-ID: <87pnctz64j.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: Raghav Gururajan , 40326@debbugs.gnu.org Hello Leo and Raghav, Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 05:03:42PM +0000, Raghav Gururajan wrote: >> Hello Guix! >> >> Please find the attached patch to remove deprecated package-definitions of bctoolbox and ortp. > > These packages haven't been deprecated, as I understand it. That would > mean they had been defined with the deprecated-package procedure for a > while. I think it's hard to understand why this is done here without context. Raghav has started working on packaging Linphone and has made new definitions for bctoolbox and ortp in a new (gnu packages linphone) module. So these packages are going to be moved rather than be outright removed. Raghav, for backward compatibility, when me move or rename a package, we bind the deprecated symbols using the define-deprecated macro (from (guix deprecation)). In this case, it'd look like, for example: (define-deprecated btcoolbox linphone:bctoolbox) For an actual example, you can "git show 8ab060b68b3". Maxim