Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi! > > Marius Bakke skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>>> I think we should export %guix-channel-introduction, or alternatively >>>> add a %default-guix-channel that can be inherited, for easy access in >>>> custom channels.scm files. WDYT? >>> >>> The idea was to expose only ‘%default-channels’, which leaves room for >>> the possibility of having multiple channels by default. I’d rather >>> avoid exposing the individual bits as that’s a bit of an additional >>> committment. >>> >>> But note that the introduction of the “official” guix channel is >>> automatically added anyway (commit >>> c3f6f564e909ebefe752d24b325871a4e3a02d40). >> >> It is only added for people using the default channel URL, and not for >> local mirrors that may well be authenticated. E.g. (url "/some/dir") or >> (url "https://github.com/guix-mirror/guix"). >> >> Would it make sense to remove the %default-channel-url check from >> ensure-default-introductions? I think we can safely assume that a >> channel named 'guix is _the_ Guix channel regardless of where it came >> from, and if users need to override the introduction they can just do >> that. > > I don’t think we can do that: if someone who’s not currently a committer > wants to publish a fork, they’ll also publish a different introduction, > pointing to the first commit where they’re in ‘.guix-authorizations’. Right. >> Currently I do this to access the channel introduction, which seems >> needlessly complicated: >> >> (use-modules (srfi srfi-1)) >> (let ((guix-channel (find (lambda (channel) >> (eq? 'guix (channel-name channel))) >> %default-channels))) > > You can write: (find guix-channel? %default-channels). Ah, much better. >> (list [other channels omitted] >> (channel >> (inherit guix-channel) >> (url "/home/marius/src/guix")))) > > I’m hesitant. We can publish ‘%guix-channel-introduction’ if it helps, > but it’s a slight maintenance constraint for a slight improvement. :-) > WDYT? I'm happy with the 'find guix-channel?' trick for now. Let's see if other users report workflow issues before changing anything. :-)