Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> One of my favorites tools, thank you!  :-)
>
>
> xq and yq work great.
>
> Should we name the package just “yq”, because probably it's used as
> end-user program more frequently than a library?  Push in any case ;-)

I though about the name, but there's also another incompatible yq tool
[1], so I didn't want to set a precedent that just because this was
packaged first, this gets the name.

1: https://mikefarah.gitbook.io/yq/

I've pushed as python-yq, mostly because I was undecided about renaming
it. Thanks for your review!