From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6NWnCHuCOWIh5gAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:02:03 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id gFMXBnuCOWLBQAEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:02:03 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66F3AA3A for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:02:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45802 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nWZSs-0008AM-0L for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 04:02:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nWZM6-0003p2-8p for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:55:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nWZM5-0004dk-VZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:55:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nWZM5-0000SQ-Sj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:55:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#54352] [PATCH v2] services: dnsmasq: Add more options. Resent-From: Remco van 't Veer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54352 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Maxime Devos Cc: 54352@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 54352-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54352.16479357001747 (code B ref 54352); Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:55:01 +0000 Received: (at 54352) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2022 07:55:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nWZM4-0000S6-2a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:55:00 -0400 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:48423) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nWZM1-0000Rn-To for 54352@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:54:58 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEBB3200AC9; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:54:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:54:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=remworks.net; h= cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; bh=tdWT+PIHG2QimXeL0zRcXPn/gG6xuXSWjYqvBk JAejM=; b=cviHVi0E+N0zsNnIpVcFcuBfPfJB7238NkGEIrV5Y4Tn7qfptkiSld 8jz1QTLWByeMoFs05CLwYmMCg3mBxM4TbvRJLrkyhv/dkBmBq89CLAODp85R0Vig sr+wQQsjdxjnpFrF/cBBsgOfKQ7XaGxRe+Cthpg4mXw3Nnz2phFvbsDCi69PVO9R v619XvNAn3xuKR8GYVYSi8YutoWfhDMD6P5T3OTMQgdPlaEgGkoCNoLlF4JHEg8w wQs67cZXRvXQFuTT24ccd15zRECYE9GWdLUKnktabJmp+cJZJqtRCKaJiRzFQ2lU VGLBEgcZrrwZO6z8z7uRyMlLb4bu9vuQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=tdWT+PIHG2QimXeL0 zRcXPn/gG6xuXSWjYqvBkJAejM=; b=A/C56wl8PcAJk1En6iQhNtjCr7PX3q+1l xAn9Pm+2OOo1psaPjtfW0PDblRF3F1j8cnmqr6Brl4XBNGTSSJzyeBVra6WBJGrw ndUNUmM5r6ePsG6+BAU+i7hdBlyQAoLUGGjC9Z9/9yptv7Z5WHYNFJNhOWudMOnV 1P5wspfu8o0aV7AXT4yaJKCtQ4NM53//W3ymaz57CYMug+gF0gHgPNtkUPWF5FCV ox0jnS5iJcomHtFs/DhzFNNI2V9R/JLL1985QYLvBAWTledgyZnU1iyT1TCOQqz2 dutqr46Z8+omDlXyO6Hre0VtgaledjQqEHQc3v1GB8z9tPRzS9zeQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrudeggedgudduudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpehffgfhvffujgffkfggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheptfgvmhgt ohcuvhgrnhcukdhtucggvggvrhcuoehrvghmtghosehrvghmfihorhhkshdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueelvdetveetheefudevhfejudevgfekheeltdfggedvueeg fffhkeeijeektdegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomheprhgvmhgtohesrhgvmhifohhrkhhsrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:54:50 -0400 (EDT) References: <20220312154813.5538-1-remco@remworks.net> <20220320114405.4702-1-remco@remworks.net> <87v8w8bx2o.fsf@jomco.nl> <4447df8b4a84d1a0300222b832712b45eaebb13d.camel@telenet.be> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 27.2 From: Remco van 't Veer In-reply-to: <4447df8b4a84d1a0300222b832712b45eaebb13d.camel@telenet.be> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:54:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87pmmea0c6.fsf@remworks.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1647936122; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=tdWT+PIHG2QimXeL0zRcXPn/gG6xuXSWjYqvBkJAejM=; b=uVJXNrZoa2pF4BOSkgyJ28uWq8bjBoznnPNh8Vf8UXADeuzuvruV7fSCrY12bN06a4FvpF RzwSehBTCe/RiXgQAKm+KOi5QL8Bx00dTjEBRwtWVWpBkYxfl2WconfgQhWwI3LVrE7Dy2 yp+qYVmjHzDShl1Y1igEfnX0jlgbBIXSm4oN3VAxAHmIWJcYAtKNyUyDVNpdsvWt5VjC8n 0KieQRgTLxPplCqRtCXag/HRo26chU8QaorcHr8cCncROHZjslDYpEfew43DG+Ktqs6S4g 5l9snWzZSftzFDjbkI7L39vE3ZBEX/n5+g2yFrFPBg3o/1NKWQ9nWeBlOFtaVQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1647936122; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=fVcoR8GHSR8bkqEveI1X/Z+FBK281qO0MF6xsrvafDsPbJTZUYgSzkVDoklIXWfZQ7EDNU 8rC6ySZHTGH0yQX3LIvvO1zjdrAQfZfCUwlA6thnCstDLk5rVjrxc26Wns2/r6riiWgmsO ZyXzZthLSTi6woDhXRhDtkojoRILQyNXAFS+tMer43RyPiviSDhiu4YDf9I5iUeo60obXT V3bR1GueMqP99JYlHRRTu35shTkNetl4jGOmuaSNgVZNSGCScUNkiHQCYEoTvRC4c0yG9E 6lgGwdlvNkj59BeuHUWIXf/EYRarh8jwSS+4l6iTsZmFIjOYUQb9/xBqVEkxZA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=remworks.net header.s=fm3 header.b=cviHVi0E; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="A/C56wl8"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.79 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=remworks.net header.s=fm3 header.b=cviHVi0E; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="A/C56wl8"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D66F3AA3A X-Spam-Score: 0.79 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Nypt8n62kq7L 2022/03/20 14:16, Maxime Devos: > I'm not familiar enough with DNS to tell which name would be better. > In any case, it seems like you have some material for a description > here. Additionally, you could add a cross-reference to the relevant > RFC+section number, if you can locate it. Well, that was a bit of a challenge but I did find out it's a EDNS field, CPE stands for "Customer-premises Equipment" and that field is in an IANA unassigned range but, apparently, used by DNS providers to identify their clients/accounts. So what do you think about: If set, add a CPE (Customer-Premises Equipment) identifier to DNS queries which are forwarded upstream. I don't want to dwell on the unofficial status too much. Also, I changed the field name from additional-cpe-id to just cpe-id because "additional" seems a bit redundant. WDYT?