From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:700:3204::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id ULnpERhjmGWIsAAAkFu2QA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 21:14:16 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8CraChhjmGUIbwEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 21:14:16 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=ldqlptRL; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1704485656; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=mhhbI5IrUAvVM4Iu0aJVqQ3LT3mKmoJwHVN+gZPhl44=; b=ku7/o8loB8Ps8xoSQqXaH+k7kPtUbhEX2Z6FA/aPR8ELvqqdV69GQgBZ+lQCM4Z2s+Oq/F eYWsxuRDGu/Sg6XgZwH5HUjwYkILYZPkYVnR9TWo4DNzQk+EF1v3YVMlOIVm1Z0iKmZYEr iVFahkhXQUcRgzRpA+ZiXOtzGsm5x+4rWZLL7szaUbzVUxLXuGMr2gDZ/NN8r1WqKtp6i7 irlKfFkB+RxJsPg8zkX+h616hl9s6EK+0ta/j5fub8beXxqwlLMeR8IU8m1CCsmhtQ9Hxc 0PyG4VmdJdctXKovV5Kx8LWdJAVJQsaHqM4HyGqHsgd2NnyEROg6Q3EthwJJ2A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1704485656; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=di/rOYXItkdvvNP//JDLAgilJi76XPWsmYTBTWnsC2QW7hpNfGm8q9N75FqSD4Pyg3PThy 4LnZu8XwKhzovKY1PG0XNU5T3SdOupnjXeDrmV2GCGr/cex4B7dOr/sWUyCiZ5jqk3Pj3m 5UNE6AwuOzOLKzzCC8HhRjdZ9ZW/odtqNOfsBv2pbmHWfAi1cf3LxU81mxxCKvsd1fLkM+ 5faLk2YD7IjE8UR7ysCiCuyvVF3HrkrFtYtbSm0aR2MxHObFkeWUdhUWha7+kk5fN7TawP aG6ttsad4lgh0RAW/Kmx4s+WOprdgR8n4R/SIflLEBvQlhZH4St2ECRaQXqAqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=ldqlptRL; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 190C112A4E for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 21:14:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLqZv-0000BE-GJ; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:14:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLqZu-0000B2-01 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:14:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLqZp-0005U3-PT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:14:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLqZt-0003i1-UN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:14:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#61064] acknowledged by developer (control message for bug #61064) Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 20:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61064 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Jack Hill Cc: 61064@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 61064-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61064.170448564114243 (code B ref 61064); Fri, 05 Jan 2024 20:14:01 +0000 Received: (at 61064) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2024 20:14:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58000 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLqZs-0003hf-Vf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:14:01 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::236]:58489) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLqZn-0003hN-HS for 61064@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:13:59 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-x236.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3bbbd4d2b4aso1372861b6e.0 for <61064@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 12:13:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704485625; x=1705090425; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mhhbI5IrUAvVM4Iu0aJVqQ3LT3mKmoJwHVN+gZPhl44=; b=ldqlptRLr1y2FoB4zhHWG/N7DC1X/l4FHiltEl0CsO03Yu0tTpo6RoNhK7IZ5PDgtL Q9cX6tCP6HwpYL6MCfFv3GydMB5jglAcwyQBsdMyDEHiw4mhwG9puAxuUq4fQqrM1V8P 2hwfKexHYx+QhpzA3woxFBR/pXMFdYMhl3jdP0XoImykzjXbz2RZ+Yjf2hEgGAyr43Ns Xm/2p9SwIFNNdaEzKubEz5RcUZ6T6/kx3X2wNZQbJfizKRqN8/6rcBYGzwnyXkqRwbp/ agKSSS9FcFaPh2B3/C3rmq5uQiGmc3OiPnPfBfI1ZF/gZGFRH79nLTAYVBREa1UAkmOf WCmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704485625; x=1705090425; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=mhhbI5IrUAvVM4Iu0aJVqQ3LT3mKmoJwHVN+gZPhl44=; b=UjjkEes6lJWVgXPJkL2dU27u/KOpWf63Yr34CI0ncCUsO3zyHHL7FddIw/nUGhHxLS 9+IO6vnC0CfwsdAh2PsZmOC4y7blkMIdDrCojNs81lOccZcgWzoufLvRXcNR37Yz2fEC HzOMTv1DEHDOSVkajhph4f6RiWN39FlshGakGmKZDoQlnGbKvBACRYXqBDIcdorV5sCK /fXUYw2TcxcjEnS1XycNd0+7+KkT6CBhdPHLZvBv7igsIPWR84dlRLb0UKyzoOX72NbH GqsQt1qwh3gO8VhmE8NS9wsqdFfpdIzap1HuE6zXS6zIxjQRRLNEKHt6kEcjN5FB+gIb Fxqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzT0qgO7+PAGihvA2DcoDPj55DINAylp+VNva/OLV+cDv9zefbm qLubORFFjN2B7T9ZgGM4+o+6+ZUxoqQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFXLeDoHQyFX5cV75LryKzCVzAHl7fg3DX7OPPwsimhuuNqmBmbGQ58Nq19TreorKKdNFevhw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:3286:b0:3bb:c774:563c with SMTP id cg6-20020a056808328600b003bbc774563cmr2167048oib.61.1704485624803; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 12:13:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-135-125.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.135.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d7-20020ac84e27000000b00427e708cc91sm1015055qtw.42.2024.01.05.12.13.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 05 Jan 2024 12:13:44 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer In-Reply-To: (Jack Hill's message of "Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:20:56 -0500 (EST)") References: <87a5pj1wq5.fsf@gmail.com> <20230125185518.12652-1-jackhill@jackhill.us> Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:13:43 -0500 Message-ID: <87plyfzgg8.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.19 X-Spam-Score: -5.19 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 190C112A4E X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: pir4fpfnW6Ax Hi, Jack Hill writes: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, GNU bug Tracking System wrote: > >> This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report >> #61064: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Update to 3.7.8., >> which was filed against the guix-patches package. >> >> Thank you for your report, which has now been closed. >> You can view the full report at >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61064 >> >> If you require further information, please followup to 61064@debbugs.gnu.org. > > Hi Maxim, > > Thanks for taking the time to clean up some old issues. However, Can > you say a little bit more about what the thinking is on this one? I > notice that we still have some packages (e.g. dino via > glib-networking) that are still on gnutls-3.7. Is the idea tha it > would be better to switch those over to 3.8 than update 3.7? There's a single gnutls package, which is grafted with 3.8.2. So any updates to anterior versions are obsolete :-). -- Thanks, Maxim