Nicolas Graves writes: > On 2024-03-13 14:16, Nicolas Graves wrote: > >> On 2024-03-13 12:39, Christopher Baines wrote: >> >>> Nicolas Graves via Guix-patches via writes: >>> >>>> On 2024-03-08 12:29, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2024-03-06, Nicolas Graves wrote: >>>>>> * gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm (python-joblib): Update to 1.3.2. >>>>>> [build-system]: Update to pyproject-build-system. >>>>>> [arguments] >>>>>> <#:phases>: Remove check phase. >>>>>> <#:test-flags>: Keep former test flag. >>>>>> [propagated-inputs]: Add python-psutil. >>>>>> >>>>>> Change-Id: Ide110a19431b1d26e1d7dd8d1adc3b3f0f417749 >>>>>> --- >>>>>> gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm | 22 ++++++++-------------- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm >>>>>> index 46232d3c98..122dca6e4e 100644 >>>>>> --- a/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm >>>>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm >>>>>> @@ -6169,26 +6169,20 @@ (define-public python-pystitcher >>>>>> (define-public python-joblib >>>>>> (package >>>>>> (name "python-joblib") >>>>>> - (version "1.1.1") >>>>>> + (version "1.3.2") >>>>>> (source (origin >>>>>> (method url-fetch) >>>>>> (uri (pypi-uri "joblib" version)) >>>>>> (sha256 >>>>>> (base32 >>>>>> - "0019p280s2k941mihl67l7y6amwx86639xp3zvpsg1lmyish67rh")))) >>>>>> - (build-system python-build-system) >>>>>> + "1cbjjzsh9hzaqr2cqja95673p7j88b8bd02hjpkq8xz147k6by4j")))) >>>>>> + (build-system pyproject-build-system) >>>>>> (arguments >>>>>> - `(#:phases >>>>>> - (modify-phases %standard-phases >>>>>> - (replace 'check >>>>>> - (lambda* (#:key tests? #:allow-other-keys) >>>>>> - (when tests? >>>>>> - (setenv "JOBLIB_MULTIPROCESSING" "0") >>> >>> We should look at why this was added, and whether it should be kept. >> >> This is only present in the check phase, not in the final package. I >> guess when we switched to the pyproject-build-system or simply updated, >> this simply wasn't necessary anymore. >> >> Since tests were consistantly (--check) passing, I do not see the need >> to investigate that. > > Christopher, is that good enough of an explanation to get this one > merged or would you rather have mpe really investigating it? I think it's good to check the commit message at least: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=a41f93c39d03143ce9007ad278a04fa30498bc0b Given that there's no reasoning there for this change, I think it's fine to remove.