From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id EFR4CpaD2WbJUwAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 10:10:30 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id EFR4CpaD2WbJUwAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 12:10:30 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=v7JytKZg; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=fabionatali.com header.s=gm1 header.b=J6DRZSMT; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1725531030; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=VfDox+z8RqrFJOrgPOE7lUydHhNB3NlGf36wZvjt1Us=; b=mx9mZEbAOuDP05pIH7Jq/bKOYzXiFSHonnVkco5hg7DeTWcY+ya8SM59aU0m7p/ko29vIU 369+xVCwhcdNwfa7tulobm0a0rj96f0uWCN/eqDI+dHTj0VFWEGyNkJjvJT64ORZ1aFq4h DygxIV+GMWA5yWsv30tmr8DFs4IJxrdsSmEPMn3/2THzJFIq3s8jYwmQPYnWerk8VQ8TMa XDOQDUf81+kdjqpqOzk/zvW5A/0SW0rP6l96NIaWz014+wHWfviH1aLG4lBWR/xM4NSxzG RhRDnszDKauarfwV98Ma6IxpX8l9jVSxTeZamTgDf0utcsoIv4vHfcnqsvLLRQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=v7JytKZg; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=fabionatali.com header.s=gm1 header.b=J6DRZSMT; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1725531030; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=bU4SoSWoro+IkyPago+20wkc1hnYYH/fXyjT3qEQpOxJjnGm5OKLuNQa2jr0CwRDcIYobD kANsrbQMQVukUYEU4JKrZeU0bNKKaV1sjtGDJPqct0WQ1YGoiB9vtsLGo9rSeiJO09Ej1o DDr81Cjm4eBTKjm1rBTWOmX+YIvFRNeZ8lJJ4aCPQNiHquX5FDC7K7YvMsbYAga8dCkppQ F9RGhkuKv4o3H1o8xxzCvGZVDJhFOFuDRBqqaYoHq2fcfhQ3+pVSvVmlvjjHgIk2ftvFTp ccLwkLgf8roDLeb1Oe4iR5pEfTv8uf5nr/Ou9za6ZFecXhmVc9U8N9vNP7Q9cQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E73067E536 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 12:10:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sm9RF-0004Y2-9z; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 06:10:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sm9R9-0004Wx-Mb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 06:09:59 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sm9R8-0001X1-A0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 06:09:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:In-Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject; bh=VfDox+z8RqrFJOrgPOE7lUydHhNB3NlGf36wZvjt1Us=; b=v7JytKZgryuWMru2+pJZjcY0c0zyNccYoRQ5rJu77EbrUCiGHmen9LSAXU9+NqXs848Nw4Z32bZCecdjpv+0IPFMZGrZ7xVbaxJJtsKvxsqulTSe7u9RtRL2FBaeoTo5ED4Aw/lKsVCngJF7YsZmbgsINVJkD0da9N2HxGvrVopU36275SUBWMaz0gDw8setedVqCLRmOhqTKoRFTNBS37aHDglm53xNpKQkqmp80qWSNGV0ALjbMVUM9r17pGQkFEInoB1nuxSUT7bdWupOlZ+sjXvSD5sSfKXo4+qt2KH6rQDnXAq4YpyRjuNGKaHl3bk0skE9kHcDehg4msxbug==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sm9SA-0002jH-TL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 06:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#71639] [PATCH WIP 0/5] Improve on restic-backup-service References: Resent-From: Fabio Natali Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 10:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71639 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 71639@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Richard Sent , paul , Fabio Natali Received: via spool by 71639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71639.172553102210372 (code B ref 71639); Thu, 05 Sep 2024 10:11:02 +0000 Received: (at 71639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2024 10:10:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36235 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sm9RW-0002h0-4p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 06:10:22 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:41583) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sm9RR-0002gG-1e for 71639@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 06:10:20 -0400 Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6987A60003; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 10:08:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fabionatali.com; s=gm1; t=1725530924; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=VfDox+z8RqrFJOrgPOE7lUydHhNB3NlGf36wZvjt1Us=; b=J6DRZSMTY5iEN8vU6IOrtnGg8NwSvtYHsRkh3VYdCnKOBys8d6//GJFeAzgKm4PC3i/vDa X4mQFggBBHwl8vdnuiRXYss2kgtoCTz+fiPuAwSd+AridZFLdohDt6kdRp0LHkcqGw5lp0 DRGVIKs5U+3Beixo+9oXXWCl4NtiFgjFqzuRmektKi+REnhf5OIXwulVatM9dZtG++Z844 n0sbK+9UhV68O3xIb1hvAXRH8HubVB4ZElRLj66HU/v+D1ddBTGSfE9tmy23o7N+LEp3lj uqvBglvLwK71vWeLfeBIMNiGRmvm/zXDLHX7GXBty/GYUgfzNs3kzG1H7NVrcQ== In-Reply-To: <87wmjrqv0k.fsf@freakingpenguin.com> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:06:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87plpict3u.fsf@fabionatali.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-GND-Sasl: me@fabionatali.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Fabio Natali X-ACL-Warn: , Fabio Natali via Guix-patches From: Fabio Natali via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Spam-Score: -7.09 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E73067E536 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.09 X-TUID: 9oWj/jChF2pF Hi Richard and Giacomo. > >> 1. Improve the restic backup system service [...] [...] > Ideally, we'd also move the system tests to 1 so further work can be > trivially verified by running $ make check-system > TESTS=restic. That'll require writing an intermediary bootstrapping > function in the test suite. +1 > > As a further point, I also think we should manage to update Restic > > itself to 0.17.0 (while we're still at 0.9.6 which was released in Nov > > 2019). With such an out-of-date package, the service also risks to loose > > a little bit of its value. > > That would be lovely! One particular feature I'm hopeful for is > compression support. > > Unfortunately restic stopped providing a vendor directory in their > tarball after 0.9.6 and seemingly has no interest in providing it > again [1]. Last time I tried guix import with restic I saw some odd > behavior. Someone with more experience in Go may have better luck. > [1]: https://github.com/restic/restic/issues/3945 Thanks for the link to the Restic's issue tracker. I think it's actually better to have the dependencies unbundled and built/imported individually - although this is causing us some pain at the moment. Some of the 'guix import go --recursive restic' errors seem to be caused by Go projects using a slightly different subfolder scheme? There seem to be various open issues (and semi-finalised patches) around this, such as: - https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/52362 - https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/63001 - https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/63647 - https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/64035 - https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/64036 I'll follow up on one of the threads above and report back here if I find anything useful. Thanks, cheers, Fabio.