From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53131) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8SX8-0006Bv-OK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 10:24:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8SX4-0007cu-R3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 10:24:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34163) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8SX4-0007cn-NR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 10:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8SX4-0002wz-Ew for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 10:24:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26803: [PATCH 17/36] gnu: Add java-commons-lang3. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20170506153617.3074-1-rekado@elephly.net> <20170506153617.3074-17-rekado@elephly.net> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 16:23:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87o9v0hju0.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Roel Janssen Cc: Hartmut Goebel , 26803@debbugs.gnu.org Roel Janssen writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> From: Hartmut Goebel >> >> * gnu/packages/java.scm (java-commons-lang3): New variable. >> >> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Wurmus >> --- […] >> + (home-page "http://commons.apache.org/lang/") >> + (synopsis "Extension of the java.lang package (for Java 5+)") > > Is the (for Java 5+) still relevant? Even 6 has been deprecated, so it > seems to be for any supported Java version now. > >> + (description "The Commons Lang components contains a set of Java classes >> +that provide helper methods for standard Java classes, especially those found >> +in the @code{java.lang} package in the JDK 5+. The following classes are > > Same here. I think you’re right. I’ve removed mention of JDK 5+, because it doesn’t seem very useful any more. Thanks! -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net