From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5Zww-0008AU-E8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:15:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5Zws-0003Zs-Ep for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:15:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5Zws-0003Zf-Bj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:15:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e5Zwr-0008Tc-Up for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:15:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#28690] provide a lib output for boost Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <874lr6w02b.fsf@gnu.org> <87shefmmm1.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk> <87infauga6.fsf@gnu.org> <20171020.152141.705942693700447320.post@thomasdanckaert.be> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:14:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20171020.152141.705942693700447320.post@thomasdanckaert.be> (Thomas Danckaert's message of "Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:21:41 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <87o9p1u78l.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Thomas Danckaert Cc: 28690@debbugs.gnu.org, dave.love@manchester.ac.uk Thomas Danckaert skribis: > From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) > Subject: Re: [bug#28690] provide a lib output for boost > Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:58:57 +0200 > >> At any rate, the patch LGTM in principle. It=E2=80=99ll have to go to >> =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 though. >> >> Thomas, Roel: are you taking care of it? :-) > > I'm happy to push this to core-updates. What do we do with packages > requiring boost:lib? Do we just wait and see which builds fail on > core-updates, and add `("boost" ,boost "lib") as an input where > required? It would be ideal to identify them by building (some of) Boost=E2=80=99s di= rect dependencies. This can be done on master to avoid rebuilding the world, and then pushed to core-updates. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.