From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38146)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gDw3e-0003oQ-KI
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:33:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gDw3c-00065c-Gb
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:33:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57409)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gDw3a-00064e-4z
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:33:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gDw3a-0002Iu-0N
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:33:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#33038] [PATCH 3/6] bootstrap: Add %bootstrap-mes.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33038.B33038.15400603598826@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
References: <20181014085857.3863-1-janneke@gnu.org>
	<20181014085857.3863-3-janneke@gnu.org> <87r2gld3nt.fsf@gnu.org>
	<875zxxax4f.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 20:31:59 +0200
In-Reply-To: <875zxxax4f.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Sat, 20
	Oct 2018 09:35:44 +0200")
Message-ID: <87o9boa2qo.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 33038@debbugs.gnu.org

Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:

> (attached, and also on my gitlab core-updates-next.  Now for a
> rebuild...
>
> The following derivations will be built:
>    /gnu/store/bphs45cqip5xh574azfkqn4lb0g53zqa-mes-0.18-0.08f04f5.drv
>    /gnu/store/v8d7ygp7pa7ry2cf1yxjhca8inyjy8b6-libffi-3.2.1.drv
>    /gnu/store/xbiq4rwjlbq42ycnk3g69fya8xvnl9ch-gzip-1.9.drv
[...]

> so the sha hashes may not hold up.  I'll add another comment after this
> and its i686-linux counterpart have finished...

the i686-linux hash is identical, the x86_64-linux hash changed, I now
have

    mes-stripped-0.18-0.08f04f5-x86_64-linux.tar.xz
    1lq4w6s5nqfxsffk0smg7cyrqnjls70kwwllbv8gzsjqjx4q3f2b

    mes-stripped-0.18-0.08f04f5-i686-linux.tar.xz
    1p116ya9n52852bryh34n7db4mhvi98qifmmwygl7nbyc4dz92jy

I have updated the x86_64 tarball on lilypond.org and my
gitlab core-updates-next branch.

I was mis-remembering earlier: G=C3=A1bor and you managed to reproduce
`hello', you both never re-built any bootstrap binaries...  So we
may have a reproducibility issue here, don't really know...

janneke