From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37355) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMt7T-0000PC-Bw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:14:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMt7S-0007rS-Ek for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:14:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMt7S-0007rO-C2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:14:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gMt7S-00071r-56 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:14:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#33243] [PATCH 0/1] Update libgcrypt Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20181102181207.2aa0cc01@alma-ubu> <20181102203155.GC16537@jasmine.lan> <20181106074548.4973c9fe@alma-ubu> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 12:13:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20181106074548.4973c9fe@alma-ubu> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?="'s message of "Tue, 6 Nov 2018 07:45:48 +0100") Message-ID: <87o9arj4iu.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Cc: 33243@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Bj=C3=B6rn, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling skribis: > On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 16:31:55 -0400 > Leo Famulari wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 06:12:07PM +0100, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: >> > This patch updates libgcrypt to 1.8.4. >> >=20 >> > The reproducibility problem was fixed upstream and thus the patch >> > was removed from package definition. >> >=20 >> > I applied this on core-updates-next, was that the right branch?=20=20 >>=20 >> Yes, that's the right branch, thank you! > > Just to be sure: I applied locally, someone with commit rights need to > commit it. I think you could be that person. :-) Could you create an account on Savannah, upload the OpenPGP key you=E2=80= =99ll use to sign commits there (via the web UI), and reply to this message signed with the same key and giving me your account name? Thanks in advance! Ludo=E2=80=99. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPORkVYqE/cadtAz7CQsRmT2a67UFAlvsA1kACgkQCQsRmT2a 67VdaxAAqGp6C6eTejgNcfrjivn/r/PpTMP8IgHaz+3m2vq37FSAK3N4tgxm7yOn gqPlAdVFsR20cahUHFI4qsuoekpdDDCcaq8FdxLMJa2u0Z6w0dwDUI+Kw8ivNImK c/HYjVB1op48mOVHVlfwk3zIJHr/XOKKNPTmAJBlVFyaD6WfS+8cn2CKr+uR/9zk kSGAMo3Z/kx5qbWXUY65NwhR2FAy/toGD4+zxsd+XruccStKmFEZm/CeSVVApM4q npa7DqJZJYHEl1062qGwLMiUJJ/CXmgX+zb9dxZgHxwfrPSkV8bFfr1OV3Ts8yw+ KtxQXPy19LSciNpHUK11aDwv9+ag+w/LzK9D7wakZmD+4Wdm50veP0Vuazo3bAAs iMbl7LHY43utZw0MebDpQDjYM4ZII7SI5/WwjI3OECLAHzJyjDsyYNGbgwl54HCk XQcD7H6UEre8XQfADUFO2rgrW75d9nWk87UjUZko6lz67p5BYYXNVoDiwiXnAPdB /Bv+ueGRhTRqdGR/UzRUU9NR0F2V8govJUOipD8yNJ1AMDCcG0kK2jzlsO6cNVvU tU6mdgz++/ufhTBZsgmTK4WN0ayTeDhqJRSISEq2P63jOpe0EB/jB/jjjot1U4Mc Q7Bvo6FfIQ67fVEMjDHdIAv771/zLDmruNv+3PVjra/q0GRRW5I= =S9yX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--