From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34584) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gS3ap-0007QQ-4r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:25:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gS3aj-0006WI-Jh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:25:40 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49420) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gS2f4-0003yp-3g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:26:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gS2f3-0002E9-Tl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:26:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#33311] [PATCH] gnu: Drop non-sbcl lisp support from Stumpwm 2018.05. Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 19:25:22 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Pierre Langlois's message of "Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:01:59 +0000") Message-ID: <87o9a96ufh.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre Langlois Cc: 33311@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Pierre, Apologies for not getting attention to this patch for a long time. Also thank you for working on StumpWM package! I've succeeded to build and run it. Please, take a look onto my notes about your patch below. Pierre Langlois writes: > I'm in the process of switching back to StumpWM as my main window > manager, and when taking a look at the package, I realised we still > supported non-sbcl builds while upstream dropped them after version > 1.0.0 [0]. So since StumpWM now only supports sbcl, I thought we should > just rename it to "stumpwm" instead of "sbcl-stumpwm", as that's > redundant. And then we can keep the ecl-stumpwm variant, but downgraded > to 1.0.0 [=E2=80=A6] > [0]: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/stumpwm-devel/2017-01/msg00007.= html Is there a reason to preserve an unmaintained ECL variant of StumpWM? My guess is StumpWM users will stick to SBCL upstream version. Also according to =E2=80=98M-x build-farm b =3Dj ecl-stumpwm-18.05.x86_64-linux= =E2=80=99 package is failed to build for a long time. WDYT? Please, add the following for Guix users with sbcl-stumpwm installed: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (define-public sbcl-stumpwm (deprecated-package "sbcl-stumpwm" stumpwm)) =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- [=E2=80=A6] >>>From 8180d03797ebd0c26adfc27276cc0682a04a0f8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Pierre Langlois > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:51:05 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Drop non-sbcl lisp support from Stumpwm 2018.05. > > StumpWM version 1.0.0 was the last version to support lisps other than > sbcl. This renames the current version of Stumpwm to simply "stumpwm" in= stead > of "sbcl-stumpwm" since it's redundant. However, we can keep version 1.0= .0 > around if somebody wants a version with ecl. > > * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (sbcl-stumpwm): Rename to ... I think =E2=80=9CRename to stumpwm=E2=80=9D and delete line =E2=80=9C(stump= wm): ... this.=E2=80=9D is better, but no strict opinion on that. > (stumpwm): ... this. > [name]: Rename to "stumpwm". > [arguments]: Set #:asd-system-name to "stumpwm". > [properties]: Replace ecl-variant with cl-source-variant. > (cl-stumpwm): Inherit from stumpwm but override the name. > (ecl-stumpwm): Remove. > (ecl-stumpwm-1.0.0): New variable. > (sbcl-stumpwm+slynk): Rename to ... > (stumpwm+slynk): ... this. Same. > [name]: Rename to "stumpwm-with-slynk". > [inherit]: Replace sbcl-stumpwm with stumpwm. > [inputs]: Ditto. > [arguments]: Ditto. Rather =E2=80=9C[inherit, inputs, arguments]: Replace sbcl-stumpwm with stumpwm.=E2=80=9D. [=E2=80=A6] Thanks, Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcjhxI46s62NFSFhXFn+OpQAa+pwFAlv+wXIACgkQFn+OpQAa +pzbSBAAqeAW2DEx391Tb959VZNFRbfooBfF0wt4k4Kiv0/7entTihN0n9q0TqMS dJbwyZj7/18nV34VjUxxO1Ic5CltHS1Tf887hUk3w5tYblCA8kyWeS/1C1AfpHB0 NfhuRps5dQF39Un0yiyTWZxCMwaJX+d8gd6QUnTA7hBYIqZN6RPGZ0QzFwERjAkK Z0I3xAzETDjTDdtrrzgMDqf5RxdywqQEI9u+ojeVTUNMqvs/1RrYBAweS2wT2yFI QWFQ710JNa5lXOX3i/wOIaaViAGDQZHS0nTqXs67cutgLqJYMX7/nC+Mql3y17GO 8qKJwOLcA5TbkGb/mUAnfZOn4DPmQPpicElRIXeKN93eGpiuBv/b4lEVkpGlNCgY Rx2fLY/9JlLxYu5GzCsS9yaBw1GwUh+ncgT6A6VkWH1xu7vdrWMcdVq40Cc3P5K/ bkInRXGf+xO/LLfbOYh7rSxCY62YAJXIN7crZOhQMnvlUMD22MJgMAdOrg/DNckE PBMKo4mW8p1EdjGVLihDRdEVe8oIIF2i27Fw+My0NPvZ6A9nGU1PN8Q6FNCMbHL1 SFEiccQ/fW3J6IMTINhgSvoB/aeJIfy9nmWZx8kMtY51vcSdo+2KG/mT5yAeffs8 3hRiQpVrUrJ8wemgy7AQhtyP+3Lj26ZYUK0xi7cKxCzCvShxCaU= =TRC6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--