From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36611) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnpZE-0004ut-51 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 13:54:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnpZC-00027n-EQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 13:54:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnpZB-00027G-QK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 13:54:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gnpZB-0006UV-MC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 13:54:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#34222] [PATCH 07/15] gnu: Add ruby-webmock. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87y376ghl0.fsf@cbaines.net> <20190127170820.28937-1-mail@cbaines.net> <20190127170820.28937-7-mail@cbaines.net> <87y376ropf.fsf@elephly.net> From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <87y376ropf.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 18:53:53 +0000 Message-ID: <87o982gce6.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 34222@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Christopher Baines writes: > >> Required by ruby-rest-client. Also at version ~> 2, so don't package 3 j= ust >> yet. >> >> * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-webmock): New variable. > > [=E2=80=A6] > > When version 3 is already available, I=E2=80=99d prefer to explicitly nam= e this > =E2=80=9Cruby-webmock-2=E2=80=9D, so that other people know it is on purp= ose. Sure, I've updated the patch and the other dependant patches. >> + (propagated-inputs >> + `(("bundler" ,bundler) > > Does =E2=80=9Cbundler=E2=80=9D really need to be propagated? Good spot. Indeed bundler doesn't need to be propagated, and this wasn't the only issue with the inputs. They now are as follows: + (native-inputs + `(("bundler" ,bundler) + ("ruby-rspec" ,ruby-rspec))) + (propagated-inputs + `(("ruby-addressable" ,ruby-addressable) + ("ruby-crack" ,ruby-crack) + ("ruby-hashdiff" ,ruby-hashdiff))) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlxN/kFfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9Xe03w/+OvcDPRjOIy/qGZBb3pCNcQh+nxBPNkjNN4AReWhW1Eb5bPEXfYyriOW7 c9HdAEr6KgVi9SS80QyETlzgFQEuy/5Btwm2qGycjWKXl+NGj5xKzrZJJLw2TNZ0 Uy8cnVU7eBtv3Y0clor0i2XAEmq4OxVC2KZwDDoQaBDk/ir+CcsUsRzB1w7ZaGkx bvBva1egS87aYC8xcRThT4hBsUr8m+lOgYM+fH353/vAQFZSBs4ESdw2Cq2oMgU1 XsiCAoh2Cp29qecSROqe6iXChEoJDQba5W2LTqa2PWJQhzmbN/kLekrmkhQmu9Xi 5e2Vv+kM4BM2VHFLJ8hDyoFOK/NZLmMpJ/r4pduDuIuI0gcLQdX1/+Ovy+6CLABy u4gs8oyVkNqdZjoULzx5j3kHY/GoQvTy3W8d2zzpXnsHVxW/GsAk3Z93HctgRxJj 3htsbfSRqsJwYyL4bGM/1U/oPfrNy12kPn7+bzmwOLVskXAJfZ0NZpKJwhStSJCA im+uQQa2iCxkmY5WThCtOM0O4uA12ZNrpv2xB82U5pNOEPC+wpH8Tjznp3nsCR5Q RNT2kUSKvaw6JvnBt5KtrnBHkw8Udi9r7C4kgKmsgX/tizO82UMkck9ZO9XyF54m wvfcPJX+z4T0tJ5/SuMACCzpVOHMz6df0hBnejA9U3+c4VcTWJs= =rkXL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--