From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52686)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iySce-0002jm-CR
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 22:42:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iyScd-0003US-Ev
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 22:42:04 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34815)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1iyScd-0003U9-6a
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 22:42:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iyScc-0005bT-3Q
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 22:42:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#39384] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-rg.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39384.B39384.158070131621527@debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87v9oqrr0q.fsf@lafreniere.xyz> <878slmc640.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
 <87pnexrrwf.fsf@lafreniere.xyz> <20200202184757.GH9517@E5400>
From: "LaFreniere\, Joseph" <joseph@lafreniere.xyz>
In-reply-to: <20200202184757.GH9517@E5400>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 21:41:41 -0600
Message-ID: <87o8ugs5fu.fsf@lafreniere.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: 39384@debbugs.gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>


Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
> Is it possible to patch the invocations of `rg` to refer to 
> ripgrep directly?

Thank you for the input, but I don't understand what you mean by 
"referring to ripgrep directly".  Can you elaborate on that 
proposal and how it would help resolve the question of whether to 
include ripgrep as a propagated input?

--
Joseph LaFreniere