From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jP8Tf-000770-CB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:39:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jP8Te-0006HG-6n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:39:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jP8Te-0006H3-2n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:39:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP8Te-0008Lw-14 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:39:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40654] [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Enable p11-kit. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20200416083409.6230-1-mail@cbaines.net> <20200416121627.6uaox5yd3vmpym53@gravity> From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <20200416121627.6uaox5yd3vmpym53@gravity> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:37:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87o8rr5o20.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= Cc: 40654@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka writes: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:34:09AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: >> Everywhere except mips64el, where a comment says it doesn't work. I can'= t test >> as I can't build this on mips64el anyway. >> >> This change will enable running the tests for libcacard. >> >> * gnu/packages/tls.scm (gnutls)[arguments]: Only specify --without-p11-k= it on >> mips64el. >> [inputs]: Include the p11-kit for all systems except mips64el. > > Chris, > > not sure if you noticed, but even though `guix refresh --list-dependent > gnutls' lists only 2 packages, this change will trigger a > core-updates-worthy rebuild due to the graft currently used for gnutls. Yeah, I noticed. This is a change I made when working on the QEMU smartcard support for GNOME Boxes [1], and I sent it as a separate patch as it does need handling differently. 1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D40631 > I was under the impression that, as a convention, we mark such patches > with [PATCH core-updates] in the subject, which made me uncertain as to > whether you realized that this will rebuild the world. (Though, now that > I think of it, testing this has probably required a significant amount > of time...) I simply didn't know about that convention, thanks for letting me know :) Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl6Yl/dfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XcgGhAAlrxEGhRrNzmKpt0BOIa7XaHlcdMfcjHxovnKNkjZenyeZ4nNlbcxGuLm QVIpZpV6OuDTMjIh4QvvWovfBgJ7A/n5XGybMyFeHQvnqtMYeu3cWMHrXgaO5JgD F003AqM0X7cLEi29SYyZvEDmQK1LqFUovP0xDEs43HqrFW9VPdzmhsHrz9sBFOW4 5kLae/5oVvLMCJ2qsPHDYJpEHKBY82rPwJWyi7WwSc3b7008aeKC+nP6ZPERDQyT +go0FOl/b0xm+Df76hNIIzC3RYR0DR6lAkHINc/9m3jIEUQ8U0GoxhuOmxjB2h5q Z7d2qC5j2fcqkmggL9XK56vCZyfELfx5XM+MOWkFVA3zmXyo/kA6vqk7c6KTyKOl TTXB9xZxHzr9Z7Jz6XS2D2BY3xzBn7M7dw/uHq3BbQPRPiG7Y0UsyIy/AXz1So7X SWvRvlrDjMya+O4qLSlDH0euOn4QW8prypNchil1dwoSm9r3gYuUxtlqR6CtHEKG DtuXL5Lyw3slhO7pi2gpCTllEIUQyHtUk+/4QZW7/h7JH/I/DpKlwdtqgoEbe3Oj TLZUF6wapEDiH788MY6aD8EvkwEaZoUYG6VVA4cqOlCYmNW2HZWeL32Vs052Wnsk umkGe9RwKus+P/d5QhtKG9opKD1miLzCk+sAJgwKfYbnic9f9pU= =hoKq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--