From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id MF0DFZoY6V7XQwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:08:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 4FTnEJoY6V7UBQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:08:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB25D9401CB for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39534 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlGwK-0005NC-OX for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:08:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlGwE-0005Mz-Sb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:08:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlGwE-00039A-K0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:08:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlGwE-0000l4-Ez for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:08:02 -0400 Subject: bug#41892: Update crawl to 0.25.0 Resent-From: Christopher Lemmer Webber Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 41892 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 41892-done@debbugs.gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: 41892@debbugs.gnu.org, cwebber@dustycloud.org, cwebber@dustycloud.org Received: via spool by 41892-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D41892.15923344732886 (code D ref 41892); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:08:02 +0000 Received: (at 41892-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2020 19:07:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlGw5-0000kU-2H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:07:53 -0400 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:39018) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlGw4-0000kM-5k for 41892-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:07:52 -0400 Received: from twig (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9397326618; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:07:51 -0400 (EDT) References: <87sgevcfyg.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87d05zuiw4.fsf@elephly.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.9; emacs 26.3 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber In-reply-to: <87d05zuiw4.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:07:51 -0400 Message-ID: <87o8pide2g.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: onCylpBuanuN Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > >> Patch attached. The new version of Crawl is amazing. Completely >> reworked spell system and everything! > > This looks good to me. > >> I'm not sure if I should push it or not given the above. Maybe we >> should wait to see if the dev responds to me on IRC about the ._* files. > > I think it=E2=80=99s fine. That=E2=80=99s one of the use cases for snipp= ets. Ok! It's pushed then. (If someone notices that the hash becomes mismatched, it's probably because the source did a re-upload removing those files... I don't know if they will; haven't heard as such.)