From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KCvUFNloiV9BJAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 09:33:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id AI+XENloiV8MGAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 09:33:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3B6894051F for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 09:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45118 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTM6p-0001R3-Ud for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:33:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTM6h-0001QL-NC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:33:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTM6h-0005Pd-DO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:33:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTM6g-00058L-Hy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#39588] gnu: Add mpich, scalapack-mpich, mumps-mpich, pt-scotch-mpich, python-mpi4py-mpich Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 09:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: zimoun Cc: Maurice =?UTF-8?Q?Br=C3=A9mond?= , 39588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39588.160284075619700 (code B ref 39588); Fri, 16 Oct 2020 09:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 39588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2020 09:32:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57681 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTM6F-00057g-OK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:32:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34174) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTM6D-00057Q-U6 for 39588@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:32:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTM68-0005In-GU; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:32:28 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=34686 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kTM5z-0005vu-Oo; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:32:24 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87blq2rclk.fsf@inria.fr> <87o8tx3z2q.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeupd3t1.fsf@gnu.org> <861rhz1d7b.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 25 =?UTF-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 229 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:32:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <861rhz1d7b.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Thu, 15 Oct 2020 21:50:00 +0200") Message-ID: <87o8l28qjh.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: 2KFKCdjVpSqD Hi, zimoun skribis: > Reliving the openmpi->mpich topic of #39588 [1]. > > 1: Thanks for staying on top of things! :-) > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 10:08, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >>> Well, for these particular patches, the variants are ok. >>> But we should think about how to ease the variant generation of all the= chain. >> >> Well again there are things like =E2=80=98package-input-rewriting=E2=80= =99 that could >> help: we could define a =E2=80=98package-with-mpich=E2=80=99 procedure. > > Now the =E2=80=9C#:deep?=E2=80=9D exists, does it make sense to implement= this > =E2=80=9Cpackage-with-mpich=E2=80=9D procedure? It could be helpful for = HPC people, > isn=E2=80=99t? Or does =E2=80=98--with-input=3Dopenmpi=3Dmpich=E2=80=99 fit the bill now? Ludo=E2=80=99.