* [bug#45773] [PATCH core-updates 0/1] Allow patch-and-repack to work with plain files.
@ 2021-01-10 20:02 Maxim Cournoyer
2021-01-10 22:07 ` Maxim Cournoyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2021-01-10 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 45773
While attempting to reproduce the now closed issue
<http://issues.guix.gnu.org/30116>, I stumbled upon another annoyance, which
is that the patch-and-repack procedure used as part of an origin derivation
didn't support single files, so the following failed, for example:
<#part type="text/plain" filename="/home/maxim/src/guix-core-updates/repro.scm" disposition=inline description="Script exhibiting problem">
<#/part>
The following patch fixes that, allowing to use plain files with any of the
already supported compressors, or non-tarball archived that would include a
single directory (the same convention as used for our tarballs).
Maxim Cournoyer (1):
guix: packages: Allow patch-and-repack to work with plain files.
guix/packages.scm | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
tests/packages.scm | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--
2.29.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [bug#45773] [PATCH core-updates 0/1] Allow patch-and-repack to work with plain files.
2021-01-10 20:02 [bug#45773] [PATCH core-updates 0/1] Allow patch-and-repack to work with plain files Maxim Cournoyer
@ 2021-01-10 22:07 ` Maxim Cournoyer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2021-01-10 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 45773
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 596 bytes --]
Hello,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
> While attempting to reproduce the now closed issue
> <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/30116>, I stumbled upon another annoyance, which
> is that the patch-and-repack procedure used as part of an origin derivation
> didn't support single files, so the following failed, for example:
>
> <#part type="text/plain" filename="/home/maxim/src/guix-core-updates/repro.scm" disposition=inline description="Script exhibiting problem">
> <#/part>
That didn't work out well :-).
Here's the attachment that I meant to send along the cover letter.
[-- Attachment #2: repro.scm --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1436 bytes --]
;;; Run script with: ./pre-inst-env guile -e main -s repro.scm
(use-modules (gnu packages base)
(gnu packages bootstrap)
(guix build utils)
(guix derivations)
(guix download)
(guix packages)
(guix store))
(define %test-file-uri
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/realgud/realgud/master/realgud/common/bp-image-data.el")
(define (main _)
(let ((source (origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri %test-file-uri)
(modules '((guix build utils)))
(patch-inputs `(("tar" ,%bootstrap-coreutils&co)
("xz" ,%bootstrap-coreutils&co)
("locales" ,glibc-utf8-locales)))
(snippet
'(begin
(with-fluids ((%default-port-encoding "ISO-8859-1")
(%default-port-conversion-strategy 'error))
(substitute* "bp-image-data.el"
(("something")
"something else")))))
(sha256
(base32
"1qpn2zhh2qw579bhgjyxvf670r4kibaxls589hkm2yhwfvsjvs68")))))
(with-store store
(build-derivations store
(list (run-with-store store
(origin->derivation source)))))))
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 16 bytes --]
Thanks,
Maxim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [bug#45773] [PATCH core-updates 0/1] Allow patch-and-repack to work with plain files.
2021-01-13 17:40 ` [bug#45774] [PATCH core-updates v2] build-systems/gnu: Allow unpacking/repacking more kind of files Maxim Cournoyer
@ 2021-01-14 17:48 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-01-14 18:43 ` Maxim Cournoyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2021-01-14 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxim Cournoyer; +Cc: 45774, 45773
Hi!
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
> Before this change, only plain directories, tar or zip archives were supported
> as the source of a package for the GNU build system; anything else would cause
> the unpack phase to fail. Origins relying on snippets would suffer from the
> same problem.
>
> This change adds the support to use files of the following extensions: .gz,
> .Z, .bz2, .lz, and .xz, even when they are not tarballs. Files of unknown
> extensions are treated as uncompressed files and supported as well.
>
> * guix/packages.scm (patch-and-repack): Only add the compressor utility to the
> PATH when the file is compressed. Bind more inputs in the mlet, and use them
> for decompressing single files. Adjust decompression and compression routines.
> [decompression-type]: Return #f when no known compression extension is used.
> [tarball?]: New nested procedure.
> * guix/build/utils.scm (compressor, tarball?): New procedures. Move
> %xz-parallel-args to the new 'compression helpers' section.
> * tests/packages.scm: Add tests. Add missing copyright year for Jan.
> * guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm (first-subdirectory): Return #f when no
> sub-directory was found.
> (unpack): Support more file types, including uncompressed plain files.
> ---
> guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm | 24 ++++++--
> guix/build/utils.scm | 47 ++++++++++-----
> guix/packages.scm | 100 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> guix/tests.scm | 40 ++++++++++++-
> tests/builders.scm | 40 ++++++++++++-
> tests/packages.scm | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 6 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
How frequent is it for an origin to be a regular file other than an
archive? The underlying question for me is: will this generalization
and increased complexity pay off? WDYT?
There are aspects of the patch that I find welcome regardless, such as
the improved handling of compression helpers.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [bug#45773] [PATCH core-updates 0/1] Allow patch-and-repack to work with plain files.
2021-01-14 17:48 ` [bug#45773] [PATCH core-updates 0/1] Allow patch-and-repack to work with plain files Ludovic Courtès
@ 2021-01-14 18:43 ` Maxim Cournoyer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2021-01-14 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: 45774, 45773
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> Hi!
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Before this change, only plain directories, tar or zip archives were supported
>> as the source of a package for the GNU build system; anything else would cause
>> the unpack phase to fail. Origins relying on snippets would suffer from the
>> same problem.
>>
>> This change adds the support to use files of the following extensions: .gz,
>> .Z, .bz2, .lz, and .xz, even when they are not tarballs. Files of unknown
>> extensions are treated as uncompressed files and supported as well.
>>
>> * guix/packages.scm (patch-and-repack): Only add the compressor utility to the
>> PATH when the file is compressed. Bind more inputs in the mlet, and use them
>> for decompressing single files. Adjust decompression and compression routines.
>> [decompression-type]: Return #f when no known compression extension is used.
>> [tarball?]: New nested procedure.
>> * guix/build/utils.scm (compressor, tarball?): New procedures. Move
>> %xz-parallel-args to the new 'compression helpers' section.
>> * tests/packages.scm: Add tests. Add missing copyright year for Jan.
>> * guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm (first-subdirectory): Return #f when no
>> sub-directory was found.
>> (unpack): Support more file types, including uncompressed plain files.
>> ---
>> guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm | 24 ++++++--
>> guix/build/utils.scm | 47 ++++++++++-----
>> guix/packages.scm | 100 +++++++++++++++++---------------
>> guix/tests.scm | 40 ++++++++++++-
>> tests/builders.scm | 40 ++++++++++++-
>> tests/packages.scm | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 6 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> How frequent is it for an origin to be a regular file other than an
> archive? The underlying question for me is: will this generalization
> and increased complexity pay off? WDYT?
I think consistency is the main driver here. The url-fetch method
supports single file sources; it makes sense that the other components
handling sources support it as well. It's hard to judge of the
popularity of such a feature when it's never been available; but some
use cases come to mind such as single Emacs package file. I've made use
of such feature for the new texlive-updmap.cfg definition in
<http://issues.guix.gnu.org/45870>.
> There are aspects of the patch that I find welcome regardless, such as
> the improved handling of compression helpers.
Great! Thanks for looking at it.
Maxim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-14 18:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-10 20:02 [bug#45773] [PATCH core-updates 0/1] Allow patch-and-repack to work with plain files Maxim Cournoyer
2021-01-10 22:07 ` Maxim Cournoyer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-10 20:05 [bug#45774] [PATCH core-updates 1/1] guix: packages: " Maxim Cournoyer
2021-01-13 17:40 ` [bug#45774] [PATCH core-updates v2] build-systems/gnu: Allow unpacking/repacking more kind of files Maxim Cournoyer
2021-01-14 17:48 ` [bug#45773] [PATCH core-updates 0/1] Allow patch-and-repack to work with plain files Ludovic Courtès
2021-01-14 18:43 ` Maxim Cournoyer
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).