unofficial mirror of guix-patches@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>, 68498@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#68498] [PATCH] guix-install.sh: Make Guix modules available too.
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:58:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7a5wg9t.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877cgtmvhj.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:40:08 -0400")

Maxim Cournoyer writes:

Hi Maxim,

> Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>>> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
>>>>
>>>>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
[..]

>> Nice as it is that on Guix System you have Guix' modules available to
>> Guile by default, I stumbled onto another (obvious?) UX issue.
>
>> After doing `guix pull' (and no guix system reconfigure), you have a new
>> guix!  With new modules.  You can play with them in `guix repl'.  Only,
>> when you start the guile, these new modules are not available; guile can
>> only see the (stale) system's guix modules.  I'm not even sure how to
>> make them available to guile, other than `guix system reconfigure'.
>
> Even then, the modules available are not that of the latest pulled Guix;
> they are those of the guix package known by that guix, which was used to
> run the guix-daemon service.

Ah, right.  They're only available to ~/.config/guix/current/bin/guix,
and thus also to its repl.

>> "guix shell guile" doesn't make guix's modules available, of course, and
>> "guix shell guix guile will get you the previous guix, not the new
>> version made available by pull.  The only thing I could think of, is to
>> provide a `guile' binary in ~/.config/guix/current/bin/guile.  Hmm.
>
> I'm not sure how providing a Guile from there would help?

Maybe I'm confusing things.  Guile will only set its GUILE_*_LOAD_PATHS
if installed in the same profile; I thought the toplevel `guile' we
build in guix is a hack to do just that.  But I'm a bit out of my depth
here.

>> Hopefully there's an easier solution but if we cannot (or don't want to)
>> change/fix this, I'd possibly even rather not have guix modules
>> available to guile by default.  WDYT?
>
> Perhaps we should treat the Guix library as a first class citizen, and
> expose them to the Guile load path by default?  This would need to be
> done in some config file such as .bashrc, and could be automated in the
> guix-install. script, I believe.

That would be nice, I think.

> If we do this, we should also change the guix-daemon-service-type to
> avoid leaking 'guix' into the system profile, polluting it with old
> modules.
>
> What do you think?  Is there a better alternative I do not see?

Good questions, who would know such things? ;)

Greetings,
Janneke

-- 
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>  | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org
Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® https://AvatarAcademy.com




  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-19 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-16  8:27 [bug#68498] [PATCH] guix-install.sh: Make Guix modules available too Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
2024-01-24 22:22 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-01-25  8:00   ` Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
2024-01-29 11:22     ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-01-29 11:54       ` Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
2024-01-29 16:05         ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-03-10  1:14           ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-04-02 15:26             ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-04-07 14:37               ` bug#68498: " Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
2024-04-18 19:03                 ` [bug#68498] " Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
2024-04-19 11:40                   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-04-19 14:58                     ` Janneke Nieuwenhuizen [this message]
2024-04-20  3:36             ` Liam Hupfer via Guix-patches via
2024-04-20 21:28               ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-04-21  2:07                 ` Liam Hupfer via Guix-patches via
2024-04-21  6:15                 ` Janneke Nieuwenhuizen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o7a5wg9t.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=janneke@gnu.org \
    --cc=68498@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).