From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fDbNe-0003GY-Bv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 15:56:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fDbNa-0007ZH-DU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 15:56:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fDbNa-0007Z7-91 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 15:56:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fDbNZ-0003Vn-OL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 15:56:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#31308] [PATCH 0/3] Support u-boot on wandboard and mx6cuboxi Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87k1sqo4it.fsf@aikidev.net> <876048v27m.fsf@gnu.org> <87efiwo0ks.fsf@aikidev.net> Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 21:55:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87efiwo0ks.fsf@aikidev.net> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:18:11 -0700") Message-ID: <87muxjqhgf.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Vagrant Cascadian Cc: 31308@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > On 2018-04-30, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Vagrant Cascadian skribis: >>> The following patches enable u-boot builds for wandboard and mx6cuboxi. >>> >>> Both u-boot builds require the inclusion of the "SPL" file. >>> >>> Tested on Wandboard Solo and Hummingboard-i1. >> >> Did you install these U-Boot packages on these boards, or did you go as >> far as running GuixSD on them? > > I only went as far as using guix to build the bootloaders and manually > install them, and tested that they successfully booted... Debian. :) Heh, not too bad! ;-) > The boards I tested on were only single-core with 512MB of ram, so would > be a bit difficult to run GuixSD on. Yeah. I hope we=E2=80=99ll do better in the future in that regard. > However, this u-boot build should also work on the Wandboard Quad or > CuBox-i4, which have quad-core CPUs and 2-4GB of ram, which might > actually be useable with GuixSD. There's also been recent good progress > on free graphics drivers for this family of SoC. [...] > I've got some work-in-progress on a few more boards, but haven't had a > chance to boot test them, and some with non-trivial changes (at least > with my rank beginner guile skills)... will submit eventually. :) Heh, sounds exciting. :-) Thank you, Ludo=E2=80=99.