From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43215) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNg2i-0005pt-2d for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 10:56:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNg2c-0007w0-UH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 10:56:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNg2c-0007vp-Oc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 10:56:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNg2c-0007G5-C0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 10:56:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#31582] [PATCH 8/8] gnu: Add git-annex. Resent-Message-ID: From: Timothy Sample References: <878t88vp2n.fsf@ngyro.com> <87tvqwsvnt.fsf@mrblack.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87y3g3rte8.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87vab6shhr.fsf@dustycloud.org> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:55:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87vab6shhr.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Lemmer Webber's message of "Tue, 29 May 2018 08:45:20 -0500") Message-ID: <87muwi8qa4.fsf@ngyro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Christopher Lemmer Webber Cc: 31582@debbugs.gnu.org Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > I tested this morning. It seems to work well. Thanks for the review and doing the tests! > My one comment before I push this is a minor one... should this go in > backup.scm or should it be in version-control.scm? Not everyone is > using it in ways I would consider to be "backups" any more than other > VCS things are... I'm not. I hesitated quite a bit here. I agree that =E2=80=9Cversion-control.scm=E2= =80=9D is the right place. The website specifically says =E2=80=9Cgit-annex is not a bac= kup system=E2=80=9D. I must have been suffering from categorizing-fatigue when= I made that choice :). > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > >> Note that you didn't add a copyright header to this file (or the >> haskell.scm one either). I can do that though if everything builds >> before I push it. Whoops! Sorry. I will update the patches in a few hours unless you have your finger on the button and do it first. Thanks again!