From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59498)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1go790-0004te-Lb
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:40:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1go78t-0007CF-4t
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:40:10 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49041)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1go78t-00079w-0k
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:40:03 -0500
Subject: [bug#34165] [PATCH] gnu: bitcoin-core: Make bitcoin-qt deterministic.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.34165.B34165.154868278015140@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <qHq-f-ApWJCp4wLr7bTekukXH3hkLWqooUuEQeJIcXKG1vDbOCsBUYpeedzxf1qeM1CWiGKy6pfeME24YXbJDqD3RA6zUt3fv324jK-n09g=@carldong.me>
	<87munrivyd.fsf@gnu.org> <8736pj77x4.fsf@elephly.net>
	<20190128120720.094dd8be@scratchpost.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 14:39:35 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20190128120720.094dd8be@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's
	message of "Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:07:20 +0100")
Message-ID: <87munkrje0.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: 34165@debbugs.gnu.org, Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>

Hi Danny,

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:

> [1] https://github.com/qt/qtbase/commit/38271e9298dcf48652a6e2e08414a940a=
97867fa#commitcomment-32085478
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/243636/4/src/tools/rcc/rcc.cpp,unif=
ied contains the following patch:
>
> ...
> 228	228	         const QDateTime lastModified =3D m_fileInfo.lastModified=
();
> 	229	229	         quint64 lastmod =3D quint64(lastModified.isValid() ? la=
stModified.toMSecsSinceEpoch() : 0);
> 	230	230	         static const quint64 sourceDate =3D 1000 * qgetenv("QT_=
RCC_SOURCE_DATE_OVERRIDE").toULongLong(
> );
> 	231	231	         if (sourceDate !=3D 0)
> 	232	232	             lastmod =3D sourceDate;
> 		233	+        static const quint64 sourceDate2 =3D 1000 * qgetenv("SOURC=
E_DATE_EPOCH").toULongLong();
> 		234	+        if (sourceDate2 !=3D 0)
> 		235	+            lastmod =3D sourceDate2;

Nice, so maybe we don=E2=80=99t need to change anything and just wait for t=
he
next Qt version?

Ludo=E2=80=99.