From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57851) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEF1A-0006SC-36 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:20:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEF19-00012u-7I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:20:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEF19-00012i-0y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:20:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hEF18-0002qC-Po for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:20:02 -0400 Subject: bug#35176: [PATCH 0/5] 'guix gc --delete-generations' and '--list-roots' Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20190406212656.27025-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20190409210109.42ba3cee@alma-ubu> <87ftqrdk1s.fsf@gnu.org> <20190409225847.20265f8f@alma-ubu> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:19:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190409225847.20265f8f@alma-ubu> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?="'s message of "Tue, 9 Apr 2019 22:58:47 +0200") Message-ID: <87mukxc2h7.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Cc: 35176-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling skribis: > On Tue, 09 Apr 2019 22:02:07 +0200 > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> Hi Bj=C3=B6rn, >>=20 >> > Second, how big is the chance I could accidentally delete (all) >> > older generations of my profiles?=20=20 >>=20 >> It=E2=80=99s unlikely because if you do =E2=80=9Cguix gc -d /gnu/store/= =E2=80=A6=E2=80=9D, it still >> behaves like before. >>=20 >> Does it address your concern? > > OK, convinced. Thanks for clarifying. Cool, I=E2=80=99ve just pushed the patch series. I noticed that the compatibility trick for =E2=80=98-d=E2=80=99 would ignor= e its argument (thus it wouldn=E2=80=99t delete anything at all), so I=E2=80=99ve= fixed that. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.