From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEdk3-0007cw-0B for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:44:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEdk2-0005vj-59 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:44:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEdk1-0005vT-UB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hEdk1-0004ZK-QW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:44:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#35156] [PATCH] Add htttrack Resent-Message-ID: From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <87imvs7io7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lg0gso33.fsf@nckx> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:43:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lg0gso33.fsf@nckx> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice's message of "Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:50:24 +0200") Message-ID: <87mukwtp34.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 35156@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > Guixen, > >> (define-module (gnu packages web) >> #:use-module (ice-9 match) >> #:use-module ((guix licenses) #:prefix l:) > > [...] > >> + (license license:gpl3+))) > > Hehe. I guess nobody built this ;-) I did, but I usually start defining packages in an incubator.scm from GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH. It is well possible that I forgot to remove the initial draft there after moving the package into web.scm, so I didn't catch the mistake. I got bitten by this in the past already. OTOH, this kind of discrepancy is... frustrating =/ Thank you for the fix. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou